Caucus of Corruption: The Truth about the New Democratic Majority

ORDER NOW!!!

On Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or The Conservative Book Club

 

Follow the book on Twitter.

Blogger Reviews.

Matt and Mark's Media Schedule.


October 26, 2007
A Man of Courage

Scott Thomas Beauchamp is at the center of one of those phony, anti-American military stories which have emerged in the MSM since the war began. For anyone unfamiliar, Beauchamp wrote for The New Republic's blog and posted some lurid stories of war crimes committed by members of his unit - the sort of stories the MSM and the left just eats up, no questions asked. As it turned out, Beauchamp's stories were bogus - once again, someone was willing to feed the MSM what it wanted to hear, and the MSM didn't even bother to check the veracity of the story because it fit the MSM template for American military actions. There are two wrongs here - Beauchamp making up stories, but also an MSM which (and a political left) which uncritically broadcasts atrocity stories about US troops.

The New Republic will weather the storm and essentially try to go forward as if nothing happened - much the same way that The New York Times and Dan Rather have tried to brazen out their bald faced lies. But what of Beauchamp? Well, some were calling for him to be severely punished - and they had a strong case: what Beauchamp wrote was grist for the enemy propaganda mill and by encouraging the enemy to fight, it is almost certain that some people will die in part because of what Beauchamp wrote. But to err is all too human, to forgive is divine - especially when one is forgiving someone who is making amends, as Michael Yon points out:

I was at a reconciliation meeting between Sunni and Shia in the West Rashid district of Baghdad on 24 October, and it happened by complete coincidence that I was with Beauchamp’s battalion. In fact, I was with his old company commander for much of the day, although I had no idea for most of it that I was with Beauchamp’s old company commander.

At the reconciliation meeting, Beauchamp’s battalion commander, LTC George Glaze, politely introduced himself and asked who I wrote for. When I replied that I just have a little blog, the word caught his ears and he mentioned Beauchamp, who I acknowledged having heard something about. LTC Glaze seemed protective of Beauchamp, despite how the young soldier had maligned his fellow soldiers. In fact, the commander said Beauchamp, having learned his lesson, was given the chance to leave or stay.

It can be pretty tough over here. The soldiers in Beauchamp’s unit have seen a lot of combat. Often times soldiers are working in long stretches of urban guerrilla combat dogged by fatigue and sleep deprivation. This is likely one of the most stressful jobs in the world, especially when millions of people are screaming at you for failures that happened three years or more ago, and for decisions to invade Iraq that were made when you were still a teenager. Just as bad is the silence from the untold millions who have already written off your effort as hopeless. Add that to the fact that buddies are getting killed in front of you. (More than 70 killed in Beauchamp’s brigade.) I see what these young men and women go through, and the extraordinary professionalism they nearly always manage to exude awes me on a daily basis.

Lapses of judgment are bound to happen, and accountability is critical, but that’s not the same thing as pulling out the hanging rope every time a soldier makes a mistake.

Beauchamp is young; under pressure he made a dumb mistake. In fact, he has not always been an ideal soldier. But to his credit, the young soldier decided to stay, and he is serving tonight in a dangerous part of Baghdad. He might well be seriously injured or killed here, and he knows it. He could have quit, but he did not. He faced his peers. I can only imagine the cold shoulders, and worse, he must have gotten. He could have left the unit, but LTC Glaze told me that Beauchamp wanted to stay and make it right. Whatever price he has to pay, he is paying it.

For my part, Beauchamp is ok - God bless him and his fellow soldiers, and I hope they all come home soon and safe.

And as for Michael Yon - you know, he's out there on his own, getting the truth for us. Perhaps you could help him out?

Posted by Mark Noonan at 05:55 AM | Comments (5) | Track



Comments

Mark:

I agree. What's fascinating to me is, TNR had the chance a few months ago to save some credibility, and our only memory of this incident would have been that Beauchamp was a jerk. But the way it happened is that Beauchamp appears to have redeemed himself and re-established himself as a man worthy of respect, while TNR looks like the jerk.

It is truly a Saul, Paul type of conversion and Beauchamp deserves a second chance.

Posted by: MagicalPat [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 26, 2007 10:39 AM


I hope that when the history of this conflict is written, names will be named---that is to say, the names of those who, in the pursuit of political gain, callously engaged in activities which had to lead to more casualties.

Certainly The New Republic will be on this list of shame, along with the New York Times.

The only bright spot in this whole mess is that these people are becoming so brazen that they will end up driving off the moderate liberal base the Dems need to gain and hold power. They are so insulated from reality, associating only with those who share their views and their beliefs that the ends justify the means, that they have completely lost touch with Middle America, with the average Joe who loves his country and values truth and fairness, no matter whether he has an R or a D after his name on the election rolls.

Posted by: Almiranta [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 26, 2007 12:15 PM


what Beauchamp wrote was grist for the enemy propaganda mill and by encouraging the enemy to fight, it is almost certain that some people will die in part because of what Beauchamp wrote.

Yes, because the New Republic's circulation in Baghdad, Ramadi, and Anbar Province is massive. And in English.

Posted by: Fats Durston at October 26, 2007 08:34 PM


Fats Durston - one word, INTERNET.

Are you just being contrarian, or are you just a jerk? How did YOU hear about the articles? You subscribe?

You can admit that you were just in error, and I'll apologize.

Posted by: Kahn [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 27, 2007 01:26 AM


I can usually tolerate echo chamber stupidity, largely because it's human nature to surround yourself with people who think (or, in some cases, don't think) like you do. But the assertion that the writings of Scott Beauchamp so energized the jihadis in Iraq, so emboldened them, that there must surely be dead American soldiers as a result, is so over-the-top ignorant as to make the word itself meaningless.

It mind numbing watching you guys tie yourselves in knots trying to assign blame for this fiasco. The press, the soldiers, the Congress (reagrdless of leadership), the weak will of the American people, the Iraqis. That's some powerful stupid right there.

Posted by: Officious Pedant at October 29, 2007 12:06 PM