Caucus of Corruption: The Truth about the New Democratic Majority

ORDER NOW!!!

On Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or The Conservative Book Club

 

Follow the book on Twitter.

Blogger Reviews.

Matt and Mark's Media Schedule.


September 29, 2007
Pelosi, A Profile in Courage

Geesh:

According to this article from Cybercast News Service (CNS News), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked about the poster for the Folsom Street Fair (it depicts the Last Supper with men in S&M outfits replacing Christ and the apostles and sex toys replacing the Eucharistic) she responded as follows. Her response, and the full question asked by the CNS resporter, is below:

CNSNews.com: "I'd like to get local for a second and talk about what's going on in San Francisco. Your spokesman told the Bay Area Reporter that the Folsom Street Fair advertisement mocking the last supper would not harm Christianity. I'm wondering if you find the advertisement personally offensive."

"And as a follow up, the city's Grants for the Arts program, funded by the city's hotel tax, subsidizes the fair. Do you think that it's fair to tax everyone who visits San Francisco and stays in a hotel to support the fair?"

Pelosi: "Well that's not really a local question. That's a constitutional question. That's a religious question. That's as big a global question as you can ask. I'm a big believer in First Amendment and therefore, as I said in my statement, I do not believe that Christianity has been harmed by the Folsom Street Fair advertising."

She doesn't answer the question - it was a simple question: Do you, Nancy Pelosi (alleged Catholic), find the depiction of your Lord's Last Supper as some sort of S&M barbarity to be offensive?

Is she not allowed to be offended by anything any gay group chooses to do? I guess the better question would be: "is there anything a gay group can do which you would call offensive?". What are these people afraid of? For the Pelosis out there, these sorts of things are either offensive, or they're not - I'm all in favor of free speech; and I'll exercise my free speech by saying the Folsom Street Fair advertisement is offensive. Does this mean I hate gay people? Does this mean I think Christianity has been harmed?

The answer to both questions is, "no". As for hating gay people, I can't imagine how any would think that taking exception to something as over-the-top as that is being bigoted. As for Christianity - we're assured that the gates of Hell will not prevail against it, so an add for the Folsom Street Fair doesn't stand a chance. But it is offensive. Furthermore, as a matter of priciple I object to taxpayer dollars going to such a display.

Rank, nauseating fear - that is what we see here. Pelosi is just afraid, and so dodges the question. This is the Speaker of the House of Representatives...the leader of one of the two legislative houses of the most powerful nation in human history, and she's too chicken to even say what she thinks about a disgusting little advertisement.

Posted by Mark Noonan at 09:30 AM | Comments (11) | Track



Comments

And I'll bet Speaker Pelosi was already wearing her hijab. At least we Christians won't go out and riot, set fire, etc., when we're offended by such displays, unlike the Muslims. I DARE this gay rights group to portray ol' Mo in the same fashion!

Posted by: Macker [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 29, 2007 11:11 AM


I find her absolutely disgusting.

She needs to realize that she was only elected in San Francisco and not by the country and this country does not in anyway share her values.

If you saw the interview with Wolf Blitzer had with her, behind her was this image of Mary, the mother of Jesus.

And now she is praying for the President.

Biggest hypercrit this country has!

Posted by: semby at September 29, 2007 01:53 PM


The weak leadership of Nancy Pelosi is the same thing we got with Granholm in Michigan. And you can count on spineless moves like that with Hillary for years to come. It shows they don't want votes from Christian's who would be seriously offended. It is a shame they can't take a stand and answer a question. But will talk of their faith and quote scripture to woo voters. Let's change the picture and put something like a guy wiping his rear with the Koran, or something with a swazticka or kkk on it. Libs will be coming from all over the country to protest. Funding cut off, lawsuits filed. Inquiries into any republican congressmen for the last ten years that may have walked into that building. It would be front page news as the most appauling thing that ever happened in the city.

Posted by: Eric T at September 29, 2007 05:11 PM


Macker,

True - and why don't they? After all, if you are a gay rights activist and want to take on religious persecution of the gay lifestyle, then Islam should be the prime target...but, lefties are cowards. They'll only attack those of us who have promised not to do anything to them.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 29, 2007 05:46 PM


I DARE this gay rights group to portray ol' Mo in the same fashion!

Macker, you may want to watch your back, after that "ol' Mo" comment.

Now Mark, go easy on Speaker Mimi Piglost; she has the battle of her life in the primary, against ol' Cindy Shriekhan. Piglosi's got 'er in the plastic surgery department, though. Cindy needs to get that big honker fixed if she expects to stand a chance...

Posted by: Muy Malo Blanco Hombre [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 29, 2007 05:48 PM


semby,

Still, it is to be hoped that the Blessed Virgin will guide her - this side of the grave, there is always hope for ultimate redemption, right?

What is most disturbing about this is the cowardice involved - the Democratic leadership has a yellow streak a mile wide going down its back.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 29, 2007 05:58 PM


Noonan~ you are correct on all counts.

One more thing...where's the outrage from the ACLU about Nancy having a picture of Mary in her taxpayer paid office?

Why are they letting her off the hook?

Posted by: semby at September 29, 2007 08:54 PM


"I DARE this gay rights group to portray ol' Mo in the same fashion!" Posted by: Macker

They'd be slaughtered by the Muslims.

Posted by: Freedom1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 29, 2007 10:05 PM


They'd be slaughtered by the Muslims.

Cars would be a-burnin' like wildfire here...

Posted by: Muy Malo Blanco Hombre [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2007 09:57 AM


After all, if you are a gay rights activist and want to take on religious persecution of the gay lifestyle, then Islam should be the prime target...but, lefties are cowards. They'll only attack those of us who have promised not to do anything to them.

Geez, Mark, think before you type. Which religion holds much more influence in the US: Christianity or Islam? Given the fact that it's Christianity and that most people seeking to curtail gay rights are right-wing Christians (like you), then it makes perfect logical sense that gay rights activists in the US seeking to end the religious persecution they deal with would take on Christianity first.

The fact that it makes perfect logical sense is probably why you don't get it.

Posted by: Tractatus at September 30, 2007 01:30 PM


Posted by: Freedom1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 2, 2007 07:40 PM