Caucus of Corruption: The Truth about the New Democratic Majority

ORDER NOW!!!

On Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or The Conservative Book Club

 

Follow the book on Twitter.

Blogger Reviews.

Matt and Mark's Media Schedule.


September 16, 2007
Mark Furman Frames OJ, Again

If the dealer don't hit, you must acquit...

LAS VEGAS -- Las Vegas police said they've arrested O.J. Simpson on charges related to an armed robbery of sports memorabilia.

The arrest came after another man was taken into custody in the alleged incident.

Police said Walter Alexander was arrested on two counts of robbery with a deadly weapon, two counts of assault with a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit robbery and burglary with a deadly weapon. Two firearms were seized, police said.

Simpson has said he was among several people who went to a casino hotel room this week. He said he'd hoped to retrieve some items that belonged to him. He told police no guns were involved.

It is rather hard to believe OJ on this one, as we still haven't seen much movement on his part towards finding the "real killers".

Still, we know how quickly the police can develope a frame-up...after all, in the case of OJ's murdered ex-wife, the police were Johnny-on-the-spot putting OJ's blood all over the place. That takes talent, ya know? So, in this case, what we might have if "Furman's Revenge", where he cooked up a plot by Las Vegas Metro to frame up OJ on a robbery charge. Now we'll have to go through the whole trial thing again, and then OJ will have to put finding the "real robbers" along with finding the "real killers" on his to-do list.

Posted by Mark Noonan at 07:59 PM | Comments (13) | Track



Comments

You give us OJ crap at the same time one of the true leading conservatives of the Republican party states in his new book, the primary reason we sacrificed 3500 young men and women is because as Greenspan writes "the Iraq war is largely about oil."

Republicans are so desperate they will stoop to no low in order to divert attention from this incompetent administration.

Posted by: plainjane at September 16, 2007 09:44 PM


Mark-

The guy who was the alleged victim on this case seems to be saying OJ wasn't the robber. But I hope OJ goes to jail for a little bit, maybe he can get shanked in the yard. Also, those Pats look real good, huh?

Posted by: sleepygene [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 16, 2007 09:55 PM


Posted by: sleepygene [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 16, 2007 09:55 PM
Don't bring up the Pats, sleepygene.
Mark and I are Chargers fans and we don't want to hear jack squat about the Pats are kicking our ass six ways to sunday.

Posted by: Jonathan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 16, 2007 10:08 PM


And much of his search for the real robbers will be on the golf course.

Posted by: Leslie Bates at September 16, 2007 10:31 PM


Gene,

The Pats are just one heck of a good team, that is all there is to say. The Chargers were soundly beaten because the Pats played better.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 16, 2007 11:39 PM


Jonathan: Don't bring up the Pats, sleepygene. Mark and I are Chargers fans and we don't want to hear jack squat about the Pats are kicking our ass six ways to sunday.

WOOHOO! The Pats kicked the Chargers ass six ways to sunday!

That might sound a bit disingenuous, but I've been a Pats fan for a very, very long time. My allegiances are somewhat mixed because I have also been a resident of SoCal for a very long time. But originally it was in the LA area, which at the time had two teams (Raiders and Rams -- both of which are gone), and the Chargers sucked, so it was easy to maintain allegiances with my previous "home town" teams -- the Pats and the Boys. And I though I've attended more Chargers games than any other pro football team (3, so it isn't saying much -- they lost them all, by the way), I still haven't warmed up to the Chargers.

Be that as it may, I didn't figure the Pats would kick the Chargers' ass six ways to sunday. That came as something of a (happy) surprise. GO PATS!

Posted by: Ricorun [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 16, 2007 11:40 PM


Mark and Jonathan, don't feel too bad. For two weeks now my NY Giants haven't found their defense. My guys made Brett Favre look like he should play 5 more years instead of retiring.

Posted by: Bigfoot [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 17, 2007 12:12 AM


Republicans are so desperate they will stoop to no low in order to divert attention from this incompetent administration.

Who's diverting anything, cow? Was this OJ thing yet another Rovian plot designed to divert attention from Greenspan-Mitchell's 60 Libgressive interview, or his book? Good Lord, janie, all he said was that we deposed Saddam to protect the free flow of oil, which is vital to the global economy. Not just our economy, you silly twit--THE GLOBAL ECONOMY!!!

OJ is held without bail. Por Que? Is this equality? lol

Posted by: 1H8L1BS and I'm a Grammar Nazi, and btw, Ted Nugen [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 17, 2007 06:10 AM


Don't blame OJ's defense team. Blame the idiots that were on the jury. I still can't figure out how they managed to locate 12 of the most retarded people in Los Angeles to make up that jury. Hopefully, Las Vegas will get it right....

Posted by: LiberalsHateAmerica at September 17, 2007 09:42 AM


Plainjane:
Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman, said in an interview that the removal of Saddam Hussein had been "essential" to secure world oil supplies, a point he emphasized to the White House in private conversations before the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Greenspan, who was the country's top voice on monetary policy at the time Bush decided to go to war in Iraq, has refrained from extensive public comment on it until now, but he made the striking comment in a new memoir out today that "the Iraq War is largely about oil." In the interview, he clarified that sentence in his 531-page book, saying that while securing global oil supplies was "not the administration's motive," he had presented the White House with the case for why removing Hussein was important for the global economy.

"I was not saying that that's the administration's motive," Greenspan said in an interview Saturday, "I'm just saying that if somebody asked me, 'Are we fortunate in taking out Saddam?' I would say it was essential."

Posted by: kimberly4bush [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 17, 2007 01:17 PM


Mark Furman is slime.

The whole OJ thing is a repeat of the Errol Flynn incident, Flynn won his case and his career was not affected cos he was WHITE. When you think about it, the idea of Flynn haveing to RAPE a woman for sex does nto make sense.

Same thing about OJ killing his wife and that other guy. Who knows what really happend, I'll bet FURMAN knows all about the whole thing cos he set it up, he probably did it himself, and he tampered with that blood cos it was probably HIS blood, the bastard.

Furman was in a leetle bit of a hurry when he was planting evidence so he planted the WRONG gloves.

Of all the crap about OJ, nobody has ever answered the question, WHY DID NOT THE GLOVES FIT?

I mean, OJ did it right? The gloves were steeped in BLOOD. The goves were exactly like the gooves OJ had, but were 7 sizes too small. Even shrunken with Blood, they WOULD have expanded out when he stuck his hands in there. I know, I did it myself with a pair of my own gloves. I steeped them in blood from a few steaks and let em dry out for a few months. Inisially, I could nto get my hands in there, but after about 2 minutes I got em in, cos leather streches back out.

I saw this live on TV on the day it happened. NOBODY can tell me that OJ was messing with the gloves so it looked likt they did not fit- THEY DID NOT FIT.

How plain does it have to be? If they did not fit.. He did not DO IT.

I think OJs wifes family ought to fork over ALL the stuff they got from him in that redicuolous civil trial.

They had to use SHOES for that one. Furman did a better job of steeping those in OJs wife's blood though.

Rediculous... If he was AQUITTED there was NO GROUNDS for a CIVIL SUIT.

Now, yes, the murder of Nicole was a bad thing, but the fuckin LAPD never DID try to find out who REALLY did it- Ergo, they had something to do with it.

Screw Furman, that slimebucket: Screw him back then and screw him NOW.

The whole OJ trial made a travesty of JUSTICE. A jury Aquitted him.

The LAPD never lived down that he was aquitetd, after all that had work of FRAMING him. So now, this.

Posted by: XweAponX at September 18, 2007 03:39 PM


Great, kimberly; now Plainlamejane will be calling Greenspan a "neocon..."

Posted by: 1H8L1BS and I'm a Grammar Nazi, and btw, Ted Nugen [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 18, 2007 05:57 PM


LAPD; so incompetent they couldn't frame a guilty man.

But XweAponX does have a valid point, Flynn was set free because he didn’t need to rape to get sex, and OJ didn’t need to kill to have people dead.

I did my own experiment to prove OJ’s innocence; I went to the same hotel as the jury, deliberated for the same 45 minutes, and decided to take the towels and the robe before leaving the hotel.

If that doesn’t prove OJ’s an innocent man then my name’s not Spiro T. Agnew!

Posted by: Dasein Libsbane [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 19, 2007 03:43 PM