Weak Q1 Growth...
...but the future still looks good. That won't stop most coverage of the news to imply that the economy is bad after years of strong, solid growth.
Posted by Matt at May 31, 2007 06:24 PM
Track
del.icio.us
digg it
IM
Facebook
Comments
"Worst economy since Hoover...damn!"
Posted by: keefer at May 31, 2007 07:28 PM
LOL keefer. Thank God that is not true.
Posted by: kjstrouble at May 31, 2007 10:55 PM
Please link your source on this please. I'm so tired of people trotting out stats but don't bother to put a link to the source.
Oh, and reputable sources only please. Not some think tank that gets kick back bucks for making claims that fall in line with the opinion of those that paid them.
It's like Bush saying the budget is balanced, but forgets to mention he doesn't include cost of the Iraq War into that assessment.
Hell, I can spin anything my way if I just use figures from like minded individuals.
Posted by: walcrowe at June 1, 2007 04:08 AM
Based on your criteria, I doubt you'll believe anyone that disagrees with you, but I'll give it a try; an Economics professor from San Diego. Note also the "comments" from other economists.
Posted by: Dasein Libsbane at June 1, 2007 06:18 PM
Order Matt and Mark's book on Amazon or Barnes and Noble


"Worst economy since Hoover...damn!"
LOL keefer. Thank God that is not true.
Please link your source on this please. I'm so tired of people trotting out stats but don't bother to put a link to the source.
Oh, and reputable sources only please. Not some think tank that gets kick back bucks for making claims that fall in line with the opinion of those that paid them.
It's like Bush saying the budget is balanced, but forgets to mention he doesn't include cost of the Iraq War into that assessment.
Hell, I can spin anything my way if I just use figures from like minded individuals.
Based on your criteria, I doubt you'll believe anyone that disagrees with you, but I'll give it a try; an Economics professor from San Diego. Note also the "comments" from other economists.