You link goes to forbidden. Did you intend for people to be able to view what was at the link? You failed.
Posted by: Steve at May 22, 2007 08:29 AM
Hmmm, link don't work... I get
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /mt/archives/004896.php on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/1.3.37 Server at www.gopbloggers.org Port 80
Posted by: congressive at May 22, 2007 08:53 AM
Hmm, link don't work. I get
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /mt/archives/004896.php on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/1.3.37 Server at www.gopbloggers.org Port 80
Posted by: congressive at May 22, 2007 08:54 AM
Posted by: sunny at May 22, 2007 09:24 AM
For some reason I cut and paste this link and it worked, but its the same link as above...weird...
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/archives/004896.php#comments
Posted by: jbiccum at May 22, 2007 10:32 AM
We're working on it, guys; sorry for the mess up...but, honestly, it is a really good post!
Posted by: Mark Noonan at May 22, 2007 12:04 PM
The link can be accessed if you click on it from the 'post a comment' page.
Posted by: Canadian Observer at May 22, 2007 12:26 PM
Um... Mark... your bashing of Obama is completely erroneous. First of all, the article that you linked to doesn't provide proof of wrongdoing... secondly, your attempt to tie in Obama to greater Democratic corruption also falls short. First of all, you are committing two fallacies at once... You are taking parts of the Democratic Party and applying it to the whole (hasty generalization), then you are taking a characteristic of a group, and applying it to an individual (Division).
Just so you know, 91% of Obama's contributions come from Individuals and not PACs. Also, if you actually read the article you linked to, the "long [friendship]" that Obama supposedly had to Rezko isn't really that apparent...
Weak arguments, weak posts, same old stuff...
Posted by: Rana Quijotesca at May 22, 2007 02:43 PM
don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh!
Posted by: babyeatingliberal at May 22, 2007 03:24 PM
don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh!
Posted by: babyeatingliberal
I agree its no big deal...except that Obama made such a big deal out of his squeeky clean image. Wasn't it Obama-sama that claimed he was sooooo opposed to taking anything from lobbyists that he would even accept a lunch or a coffee from them?
So basically you are saying that Obama is as corrupt as all the other politicians, and he lies about it to boot.
Posted by: phnx at May 22, 2007 04:37 PM
babymurderingliberal says - "don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh!"
Cool. So big donations to a Republican from the NRA, Wal-Mart, and Exxon are perfectly OK. I'll let the candidates know.
Posted by: Kahn at May 22, 2007 04:51 PM
Kahn-
I don't murder the babies, I get them out of the dumpster at abortion clinics, the partially birthed abortions taste the best, though sadly there are not many of those.
We already know the republicans are bought and paid for by the insurance, petroleum, gun, and pharmacuetical industries. Just like the democrats are bought and paid for by unions, trial lawyers and hollywood. I just find this post all about nothing.
Posted by: babyeatingliberal at May 22, 2007 04:57 PM
Ok, so some Democrats got $$ from the lobbyists. But now they want to change the system. Comprendes?
That means that the Dem's want to keep these ridiculously powerful companies in check. What does it matter if they got $$ from them? Their stand is the same.
And how is this hypocritical of Obama?
Calling him hypocritical would be like you calling a rich person hypocritical because they wanted to repeal the tax cuts Bush gave them.
"you make it seem as though the drug and insurance companies have bought the GOP and run our policy, with only heroic Democrats, like you, in DC to defend the people against their depradations. But doesn't you side have some problems, too?"
the answer to this is yes, but they're trying to FIX these problems by curbing the power of lobbyists.
If anything, this is hypocriticism by the right.
ThELefTYFoOL
Posted by: the_lefty_fool at May 22, 2007 04:59 PM
BEL: You're one sick jerk. You're also stupid. The post was about Obama being a hypocrit ... which he is.
Excellent post, Mark.
Kahn: LOL!!
Posted by: kimberly4bush at May 22, 2007 05:29 PM
don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh! - b.e.l
No it's not a scandal b.e.l., it's called HYPOCRISY.
I guess when people like you attempt to create scandals around everything, you actually lose sight of the meaning of the word.
Posted by: neocon at May 22, 2007 05:33 PM
I just find this post all about nothing. - b.e.l.
Funny, I find your positions and comments all about nothing.
Posted by: neocon at May 22, 2007 05:36 PM
I challange you to find one politicial who is not a hypocrit.
Posted by: Robert at May 22, 2007 06:00 PM
Where's the spell-checker on this thread? lol!
Posted by: Ricorun at May 23, 2007 01:10 AM
Funny, I find your positions and comments all about nothing.
Ditto, neocon--he's no different than most of the neolibs on this blog. Well, he's a notch or two above kblack, but, then again, so is pond scum...
Posted by: keefer at May 23, 2007 07:15 PM
You link goes to forbidden. Did you intend for people to be able to view what was at the link? You failed.
Hmmm, link don't work... I get
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /mt/archives/004896.php on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/1.3.37 Server at www.gopbloggers.org Port 80
Hmm, link don't work. I get
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /mt/archives/004896.php on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/1.3.37 Server at www.gopbloggers.org Port 80
me too - forbidden
For some reason I cut and paste this link and it worked, but its the same link as above...weird...
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/archives/004896.php#comments
We're working on it, guys; sorry for the mess up...but, honestly, it is a really good post!
The link can be accessed if you click on it from the 'post a comment' page.
Um... Mark... your bashing of Obama is completely erroneous. First of all, the article that you linked to doesn't provide proof of wrongdoing... secondly, your attempt to tie in Obama to greater Democratic corruption also falls short. First of all, you are committing two fallacies at once... You are taking parts of the Democratic Party and applying it to the whole (hasty generalization), then you are taking a characteristic of a group, and applying it to an individual (Division).
Just so you know, 91% of Obama's contributions come from Individuals and not PACs. Also, if you actually read the article you linked to, the "long [friendship]" that Obama supposedly had to Rezko isn't really that apparent...
Weak arguments, weak posts, same old stuff...
don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh!
don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh!
Posted by: babyeatingliberal
I agree its no big deal...except that Obama made such a big deal out of his squeeky clean image. Wasn't it Obama-sama that claimed he was sooooo opposed to taking anything from lobbyists that he would even accept a lunch or a coffee from them?
So basically you are saying that Obama is as corrupt as all the other politicians, and he lies about it to boot.
babymurderingliberal says - "don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh!"
Cool. So big donations to a Republican from the NRA, Wal-Mart, and Exxon are perfectly OK. I'll let the candidates know.
Kahn-
I don't murder the babies, I get them out of the dumpster at abortion clinics, the partially birthed abortions taste the best, though sadly there are not many of those.
We already know the republicans are bought and paid for by the insurance, petroleum, gun, and pharmacuetical industries. Just like the democrats are bought and paid for by unions, trial lawyers and hollywood. I just find this post all about nothing.
Ok, so some Democrats got $$ from the lobbyists. But now they want to change the system. Comprendes?
That means that the Dem's want to keep these ridiculously powerful companies in check. What does it matter if they got $$ from them? Their stand is the same.
And how is this hypocritical of Obama?
Calling him hypocritical would be like you calling a rich person hypocritical because they wanted to repeal the tax cuts Bush gave them.
"you make it seem as though the drug and insurance companies have bought the GOP and run our policy, with only heroic Democrats, like you, in DC to defend the people against their depradations. But doesn't you side have some problems, too?"
the answer to this is yes, but they're trying to FIX these problems by curbing the power of lobbyists.
If anything, this is hypocriticism by the right.
ThELefTYFoOL
BEL: You're one sick jerk. You're also stupid. The post was about Obama being a hypocrit ... which he is.
Excellent post, Mark.
Kahn: LOL!!
don't bother to click on the link it is all about nothing. politicians take money from special interests yet say they won't. Big scandal. Sheesh! - b.e.l
No it's not a scandal b.e.l., it's called HYPOCRISY.
I guess when people like you attempt to create scandals around everything, you actually lose sight of the meaning of the word.
I just find this post all about nothing. - b.e.l.
Funny, I find your positions and comments all about nothing.
I challange you to find one politicial who is not a hypocrit.
Where's the spell-checker on this thread? lol!
Funny, I find your positions and comments all about nothing.
Ditto, neocon--he's no different than most of the neolibs on this blog. Well, he's a notch or two above kblack, but, then again, so is pond scum...