C'mon, Matt, the donks have more important business to take care of--minimum wage, killing babies in order to do unproven research, free college for lazy people, and free medical for more lazy people.

There's no time in their agenda for something as paltry as national security...

And they dems break ground on their new political grave...Murtha was the guy who cut the ribbon with the giant scissors. Hard to concentrate on national security when most of your resources are allocated to investigating Bush and his 'Secret American Gulag System™'.

Way to go, Matt & Keef.

The donks say they can't get all 41 recomendations done in 100 hours...the Repugs couldn't do it in 2 years. If that's a bad thing, what's your excuse for the Repugs failure, hmmm?

Anybody who knows anything about politics (you two demonstrably don't) knows it takes more than 100 hours to re-organize congress. Duh!

Don't worry, guys. The Dems have 17,520 hours of free time courtesy of the American people. They will be crafting laws as fast as they can write them, including implementing the 9/11 commission report (which you guys hate anyway, so I don't know why you're complaining.) You're assertion that they aren't writing laws fast enough sounds more like my position than yours.

"They will be crafting laws as fast as they can write them"

That should have been written like this Mr. Oliver:

They will be crafting up as much corruption and evil laws as fast as they can write them!!

There we go, much better!!

Jeremiah

"Crafting laws", its what those laws might be which disturbs me. They might as well get going now, two years of the liberal 'plan' is about all the American people will be able to handle and the dems know it.

The democrat circus has begun and the donkeys havent even entered the main ring, this should be quite the spectacle. There must be a place for Alcee somewhere, perhaps teaming up with Carter as special envoys to Iran or something.

Yes, much better, and welcome back, Jeremiah.

Glad to see you haven't succumbed(sp?) to infection, Jimmy Olive Oyl. I was worried. However, it's clear the lobotomy was a success--you're an even bigger idiot than you were. They can "craft" all the laws they wish--do you realize how many they've "crafted" in the past six years? Whatever they "craft" has to get through the House and Senate, and the last time I counted, they had neither a filibuster-proof nor a veto-proof majority. Good luck with all that law "crafting."

Overheard at a doctor's press conference:

"Prior to the operation, we performed a CAT scan of Mr. Olive Oyl's brain. The CAT scan showed nothing. However, we decided to proceed with the lobotomy. After all, Mr. Olive Oyl paid for a lobotomy. Besides, all that was required was a pea-sized hole, drilled into Mr. Olive Oyl's forehead. We then rolled Mr. Olive Oyl onto his stomach, wiggled his head a little, and that little bugger came a-rollin' out of that hole as easy as pie.

Mr. Olive Oyl's family should not be concerned--other than the pea-sized scar on his forehead, there will be no discernable difference in theis man. A pea-brain has a relatively low IQ, so nothing was lost by us performing this lobotomy."

Yes, Jim, it's true--I can't stand your ass. You're a frickin' brain-dead parrot, and a waste of precious oxygen. Bugger off, wanker...

Don't worry, Matt; maybe the donk-turds will act on the Baker Commission recommendations, as long as the recommendations contain the following:

1. Raise the minimum wage.
2. Federally fund embryonic stem cell research and any other useless research which allows you to raise taxes.
3. Give free college education to those who don't recognize the value of hard work.
4. Screw up the health care system worse than it already is by giving everyone free health care, thereby increasing the size of an already-bloated government.
5. Try to bring the troops home. Try. Try. Try.

You see, the donk-turds do a lot of "trying." As in Clinton, when interviewed by Chris Wallace on Fox News: "For eight years, I tried. I may have failed to get him, but I tried. They had eight months, and they didn't even try."

Hey, Slicky Blue Dress' next book title: "At Least I Tried."

"They will be crafting up as much corruption and evil laws as fast as they can write them!!

There we go, much better!!"

"Yes, Jim, it's true--I can't stand your ass. You're a frickin' brain-dead parrot, and a waste of precious oxygen. Bugger off, wanker.."

Jerk store called, they're running out of keefer and Jeremiah!!!

Gar Wood

Mr. Wood,

The truth, must not be worth a whole lot to you!

Jeremiah

Yeeh-Haw!

It's a barn dance.

Yes, Jim, it's true--I can't stand your ass. You're a frickin' brain-dead parrot, and a waste of precious oxygen. Bugger off, wanker...

ROTFLMAO!! Geez, keefer, tell us how you really feel.

You see, the donk-turds do a lot of "trying."

Yeah, Liberalism is definitely an "effort" oriented philosophy. Results are inconsequential.

Results are inconsequential.

Ah, but just wait a few years, then your eyes will be opened.

Jeremiah

Jeremiah and Keefer here's one for you. I think this applies to you both.

Ya psychos...yeesh.

A collective “I told you so” will ripple through the world of Bush-bashers once news of Christopher Lohse’s study gets out.

Lohse, a social work master’s student at Southern Connecticut State University, says he has proven what many progressives have probably suspected for years: a direct link between mental illness and support for President Bush.

Lohse says his study is no joke. The thesis draws on a survey of 69 psychiatric outpatients in three Connecticut locations during the 2004 presidential election. Lohse’s study, backed by SCSU Psychology professor Jaak Rakfeldt and statistician Misty Ginacola, found a correlation between the severity of a person’s psychosis and their preferences for president: The more psychotic the voter, the more likely they were to vote for Bush.

raker..you are certifable.............

"The donks say they can't get all 41 recomendations done in 100 hours...the Repugs couldn't do it in 2 years. If that's a bad thing, what's your excuse for the Repugs failure, hmmm?"

Wow, that is the most pathetic piece of spin I've ever seen. This isn't about getting something done in a certain amount of time.. this about Democrats blaming Bush for something they have no intention of doing. Why don't you start being honest Jim?

Mr. Spook,

I apologize, I mistakenly took you as a lefty, sorry 'bout that!

Jeremiah

No harm, no foul, Jeremiah.

Raker, are you still playing with chris penis! Or is it your own wood that your playing with! How about Gars wood. You really need to stop playing with the wood raker. Lohse needs to quit wasting our money, the only thing he's accomplishing is raising the DEAD(in your pants that is)!LMAO!

Hey Jim, I don't think Keefer likes you........ don't blame him. I think this is the most intelligent conversation Jim has had all day! Yeehaw!!!

The more psychotic the voter, the more likely they were to vote for Bush.

Were the 69 patients found working at DNC offices? Was it or was it not liberals who suffered post-election psychotrauma after 2000 and 2004 and actually sought therapy for said affliction?

BTW, I just conducted a study myself, co-authored by my plumber and triple checked by the guy who works the local deli counter; 9 out of 10 certifiable morons would vote democrat. The tenth person was busy staring into the sun and refused to answer.

This study is no joke. No really.

A collective “I told you so” will ripple through the world of Bush-bashers once news of Christopher Lohse’s study gets out.

Lohse, a social work master’s student at Southern Connecticut State University, says he has proven what many progressives have probably suspected for years: a direct link between mental illness and support for President Bush.

Lohse says his study is no joke. The thesis draws on a survey of 69 psychiatric outpatients in three Connecticut locations during the 2004 presidential election. Lohse’s study, backed by SCSU Psychology professor Jaak Rakfeldt and statistician Misty Ginacola, found a correlation between the severity of a person’s psychosis and their preferences for president: The more psychotic the voter, the more likely they were to vote for Bush.

Oh wow ... out of millions of millions of Americans, we have a study conducted on 69 people who have gone to a shrink. Mind you this is in one state, out of 49. And my goodness, in THREE different locations. Such a brilliant BRILLIANT study. *Claps his hands loudly in mock applause* PLEASE feed us more of this titillating, scientific mastery of the thought patterns of the human race.

... Seriously dude, gimme a break. This is, in my honest opinion, THE BIGGEST crock of crap I have ever seen. The moron who did this so called study, needs to be really really careful in what kinds of reports he's making. The dude is a crack case. And the other psychologists and statisticians and whoever else, who ratified this study as a representation of Conservatives, are crack-cases too.

This is nothing more than an example of the leftwing hate machine spinning one of its webs of hatred, and just b/c he's doctor doesn't mean he won't work with the left. Malpractice happens every day, everywhere. Just ask a few welfare officials and government officials around the country. Honestly, to insinuate that a study of 69 people represents America as a whole, is stupid. Plain, unadultered, pure stupidity. This moron sounds like something out of the Far Side ... The Far Left Side, that is. Someone needs to be investigating this guy.

Lucas

Hey Raker, If you intelligencia put as much time into figuring out how to win the war as you do into your stupidas. studies we would have won the war and brought our boyz/girlz home! Yet another perfect example of partisan politics before our military men & women! Sad.......just sad!!!

Raker should be commended for his courage in admitting to the level of "science" and quality of the research on which so much of the Democratic mania is based.

I do not doubt that raker truly believes this bogus study to be not only accuate but valuable. That's OK. It's not as if the study changed his mind. It's not as if it will change any minds, as it is so ludicrous and bizarre that it can only appeal to the totally committed. (Not just to those committed to mental institutions but those committed to hardcore hate-based radical Leftism---though I admit, any difference between the two should be eliminated.)

A group which is so dependent on what I call the "Chicken Guts" approach to poltiics---that is to say, the ability to somehow divine hidden motives and intent, in much the same way Santeria uses the entrails of poultry----is going to jump on this psuedo-study and claim it as their own. And I say that is a good thing, because it widens the gulf between normal, sincere, Democrats who are already alarmed at the radical death spiral they see their party entering and those who are tryin to accelerate it.

that is to say, the ability to somehow divine hidden motives and intent

Sort of like you somehow divining the hidden motives and intent of Pat Tillman and being 100 percent incorrect? Whoopsie-daisy, Li'l Almy!