No.

I dont have to think long and hard about who I am voting for, the decision isnt that difficult. Everytime I hear a democrat speak, I get the chills and visions of terrorists waltzing across the borders flashes through my mind.

I cant trust the libs with my money, my children, my society, my culture, my freedoms, my future or my security. Nationalized health-care, maxed-out minimum wage and generous welfare benefits wont help you a bit if youre vaporized by a bomb in a subway or on a bus.

Vote republican if you enjoy life.

Vote republican if you enjoy life

That is true on so many levels.

-Leo-

Amigos, I believe that Kerry ain't runnin for election. Mayhap that he were you could vote against heem. As it stands right now, we stand to lose big time, and bashin on Kerry just doesn't play to well with voters who are malcontents over Bush's policies.

My point is that if the dems would win the majority, views like Kerry's would rule the day.

So yes, it is relevant.

-Leo-

Kerry should move to France or Switzerland...

As it stands right now, we stand to lose big time,
Wang!

You pretending to be a repub. wang or have you come to grips with the destiny of liberalism?

You know, I just can't help but see the parallel between your treatment of Kerry and the left's treatment of Bush. The left campaigns against Bush, the right campaigns against Kerry... and neither of them are on the ballot... huh...

Kerry is a walking Neanderthal turned politician. A true moron..

You're strangely obsessed with a man who most Democrats want nothing to do with.

This post makes no less than eight posts about John Kerry currently on the front page of Blogs for Bush. This site is based on hate. Hate Clinton, hate Murtha, hate the other Clinton, hate hate hate Kerry. Instead of attacking the best and brightest people and arguments of the Democratic party, you choose to attack the dumbest and weakest. Hey, don't strain yourself on my account...you're just reinforcing your own weakness.

Actually sKerry should move to Iran.
maybe we could see his video on michael Savages site.

When I want to buy a top-quality, name-brand watch, I don't stop by the card table set up on a street corner during rush hour.

When I want to buy a quality car, I don't go out to the edge of town, where Just Passing Thru Auctions is selling "Super Steals and Incredible Deals — Hurry! One Day Only!!"

And, when I want the "Truth" about John Kerry or any other Democrat, Blogs for Bush is about the last place on Earth I would look.

"Is this the party you want representing you in Washington?"

Frankly, I'm not too fond of EITHER alternative at this point. But considering the situation, maybe foxes guarding the foxes guarding the henhouse is the least bad choice.

Instead of attacking the best and brightest people and arguments of the Democratic party, you choose to attack the dumbest and weakest.

I thought Kerry was the libs best and brightest, you DID put him up as your nominee for POTUS a few years back, did you not?

As for other candidates for 'best and brightest' on the liberal side, the pickings are mighty slim.

LtB: "As for other candidates for 'best and brightest' on the liberal side, the pickings are mighty slim."

Pardon me for asking the obvious, but... who would you offer as "the best and brightest" on the conservative side? This isn't a trivial question. I'm being serious. Who would it be?

I thought you were looking for a new sandbox to play in?

Anyhoo, if I had my druthers (love that word) I would choose Tim Pawlenty or Newt as my nominee. Youll have to dig a little to get dirt on Pawlenty, just in case you feel the desire to flame on my choices.

Nice video, if a bit repetative.

In the end the election comes down to several hundred individual races and individual choices. As much as we want to nationalize it I'm not sure it'll work too well. Here in California it looks like we'll have a Republican sweep on State elections, though how Republican most of these folks are is up for debate. *Shrugs*

In the end it'll come down to the folks in the individual districts to get out the vote, motivate folks to vote, and to to try and get folks to support their guys. I certainly hope we can pull together and win this one, but there are so many races it'll be interesting to see how long it'll be before we know who won.

On the McGlauflin Report today he and that real liberal girl he has on there accused the White House of staging the picture of the soldiers with the "Jon Cary" sign.

LtB: "I thought you were looking for a new sandbox to play in?"

Give me time. Meanwhile I reserve the right to comment on comments I have already made. Hard experience has taught me to never turn my back on the door until I'm through it. And to turn around once I am. I'm not exactly paranoid, I'm just inclined to be very careful.

Anyhoo, I have no intention to "flame" your choices. But in naming them I think you proved my point. In other words, in much the same way that I doubt you'd muster much of a consensus among liberals that Kerry is their guy, I doubt you'd muster much of a consensus among conservatives that either Pawlenty or Gingrich are their guys, either.

True, yet Pawlenty never slandered the troops. Ill take PawPaw over Carry anyday.

Kerry may NOT be running in this election, but don't think this egomaniac didn't have thoughts of a return engagement in 2008. Problem is, he came out ONCE AGAIN with his true thoughts about our men and women in uniform, and thought he could
take another swipe-but it backfired. He is STILL
anti military, just like he was in VietNam, and he still bad mouths those that are truly fighting for our freedoms. He, after 5-7 deferments, only
to get snagged by the draft finally, agreed on the
Navy, and tried making himself a real hero, by his
self inflicted wounds(3) in 4 months-so he could get his medals and run. Run, that is, to testify
and lie before Congress, making himself out to be the worst of the worst during that time(along with
Hanoi Jane). If you doubt what this treasonist was all about, and STILL IS, then you need to look
up his picture that hands in the VietCong Museum,
with the caption that thanks him for helping them
defeat the enemy-The United States Of America.

Trouble is, many of you who are nostalgic for the days of VietNam, when you influenced what was happening in that war, ARE trying to do the same with this one, influencing yet another enemy that wants to KILL AMERICANS, AND ANYONE WHO IS NOT THE SAME SO CALLED RELIGION AS THEM-ISLAMOFASCISTS
AND IT DON'T MATTER WHAT PARTY YOU ARE WITH, THEY
WANT TO KILL YOU FOOL.

WATCH FOX: "OBSESSION-RADICAL ISLAM", AND THEN TELL ME IF YOU THINK 'CUTTING AND RUNNING, OR APPEASING THESE NUTS, IS WHAT SHOULD BE DONE. ASK YOURSELF, IF THIS IS WORKING IN FRANCE, GERMANY OR THROUGHOUT EUROPE RIGHT NOW- IT ISN'T,
AND WE ARE "ALL AT RISK", SO FACE FACTS-THEY WANT TO TAKE OVER EVERYONE FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH, AND THEIR CAUSE.

Rumsfeld: "You go to war with the military you have, not the military you wish you had."

How are Rummy's remarks not a slam against the military? Lets hear any of you defend that.

What Rummy really should have said was: "You go to war with the incompetent loser Secretary of Defence you're stuck with, not the honorable competent leader you wish you had."