Well, perhaps not entirely new - for all I know, the idea has been out there for a while, but this is the first time I've ever seen it, and I like it. What brought it to my attention is the Kenneth Wegner campaign for Nevada's 1st Congressional district (details over at Battle Born Politics). This district (my district, as it turns out) is majority Democrat, so any GOPer running is a bit of a forlorn hope, but a good campaign can at least stir things up - and Wegner's "first out, first back in" program sounds like a winner to me.
What this entails is that if an illegal immigrant will voluntarily return home, he'll be fast-tracked in line to come back in to the United States legally. I like it because it provides an incentive for voluntary repatriation as well as for legal entry. This is entirely in keeping with my support for President Bush's guest worker program, as well as my over-arching border security idea of securing the border by making legal entry massively more attractive than illegal entry.
At any rate, "first out, first back in" is an idea I think should be on the table in any border security program we enact.
Posted by Mark Noonan at October 26, 2006 01:39 AM
Comments
I agree with this program, Mark, as long as the provision doesn't apply to libs. For them, it should be "first out, never back in."
Deport all the libs, and there will be a labor shortage. Even with the illegals here, wages will go up. Yes, I know, many of the libs don't even work. Think of the money the country will save on welfare/unemployment benefits.
Close the borders; keep the illegals; deprot the liberals. That's my platform--will you vote for me?
Posted by: 1H8L1BS at October 26, 2006 04:42 AM
I meant "deport" the liberals, not "deprot."
Posted by: 1H8L1BS at October 26, 2006 07:58 PM
I've been campaigning for a program which never ever allows citizenship to be an option for any illegal who chooses to remain in the country under a guest worker program, but allowing anyone who voluntarily returns to his or her country of origin the right to apply for re-entry and citizenship as any other would.
But I don't think I like the "first out, first in" idea because it sounds like it can still put a scofflaw ahead of someone who never entered the country illegally at all. Unless the bill is written in such a way to prevent an illegal alien from gaining ANY advantage through his disrespect for our laws, I could not support it. I don't think that illegally entering the United States and then returning home should provide a short cut through the system.
On the surface, it sounds good, a way to get people to return home voluntarily. But there are other ways to do that---merely making citizenship forever unattainable unless one returns home voluntarily is something of a carrot, accompanied by the stick of becoming a felon by failing to register within a certain time frame and thereby becoming ineligible to even remain here or qualify for a guest worker program. Between those two extremes would be the ability to remain for some time on a temporary work visa and then to be able to apply for a permanent residency, after passing tests in English and what we used to call "civics".
Posted by: Almiranta at October 27, 2006 01:52 AM
Please report any inappropriate comments to abuse (at) blogsforbush (dot) com. Be sure to include the title of the blog entry, the name of the commenter, and the text of the offending comment.
Post a comment

I agree with this program, Mark, as long as the provision doesn't apply to libs. For them, it should be "first out, never back in."
Deport all the libs, and there will be a labor shortage. Even with the illegals here, wages will go up. Yes, I know, many of the libs don't even work. Think of the money the country will save on welfare/unemployment benefits.
Close the borders; keep the illegals; deprot the liberals. That's my platform--will you vote for me?
I meant "deport" the liberals, not "deprot."
I've been campaigning for a program which never ever allows citizenship to be an option for any illegal who chooses to remain in the country under a guest worker program, but allowing anyone who voluntarily returns to his or her country of origin the right to apply for re-entry and citizenship as any other would.
But I don't think I like the "first out, first in" idea because it sounds like it can still put a scofflaw ahead of someone who never entered the country illegally at all. Unless the bill is written in such a way to prevent an illegal alien from gaining ANY advantage through his disrespect for our laws, I could not support it. I don't think that illegally entering the United States and then returning home should provide a short cut through the system.
On the surface, it sounds good, a way to get people to return home voluntarily. But there are other ways to do that---merely making citizenship forever unattainable unless one returns home voluntarily is something of a carrot, accompanied by the stick of becoming a felon by failing to register within a certain time frame and thereby becoming ineligible to even remain here or qualify for a guest worker program. Between those two extremes would be the ability to remain for some time on a temporary work visa and then to be able to apply for a permanent residency, after passing tests in English and what we used to call "civics".