Blogs for Bush Team
Matt Margolis, Founder/Editor
Mark Noonan, Editor
Kevin Patrick, Senior Writer
Paul Lewis, Senior Writer

News Tips

Guest Bloggers
Leo Pusateri

Blogroll For Bush


Above are the 43 most recently updated blogs. Click here for the full blogroll

Allies


Archives
Categories

B4B Coverage Of...
The 2004 Republican National Convention
The Alito Nomination
The Roberts Nomination
The Roberts Hearings
Hurricane Katrina

Recent Posts
"Caucus of Corruption" Gets First Endorsement
The Latest Paranoid Conspiracy Theory
Chris Wallace Responds
The End of Great Britain
Senior Terrorist Leader Captured in Iraq
Hillary's bedfellows?
Is Osama bin Laden Dead?
What is Wrong With Islam?
Democrats Fear End of Voter Fraud
More of That Global Warming
Houston Police Officer Murdered By Illegal Immigrant
Hard Hitting Politcal Ad - More Please And Faster, A Lot Faster
Bill Clinton's meltdown?
US Army: Best Recruiting Year Since 1997
Iran, Venezuela, War and Oil
The Theocons
Open Thread: Atlas Shrugged
Chavez in Perspective
Harkin Dishonors Our Country
Democrats Roved Yet Once Again


Margolis Media Works

Add to My Yahoo!
CentCom

GOP Bloggers

Thank you, President Bush

Social Security Information



Blogs for Bush Store





Search The Grand Old Portal

Donate to Blogs For Bush to help keep us blogging!
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Prime Sponsor

Premium Sponsors

More Sponsors


GOP Bloggers


Subscribe To B4Bcast!


Site Credits
RSS 2.0

Powered by:
Movable Type 3.2

Design by:





ANNOUNCEMENT: Matt Margolis & Mark Noonan get a book deal!


September 22, 2006
Bill Clinton's meltdown?

In the aftermath of The Path to 9/11, Bill Clinton is becoming desperate to resuscitate his legacy. Witness this meltdown:

Note how he keeps on saying, "I tried!" again and again.

I believe that history, rightly, will judge otherwise.

Posted by leo at September 22, 2006 08:48 PM



Comments

He says we on the right condemned him for trying too hard to capture bin Laden?

Very strange man - and really rather sad; a useless life...he has achieved much only to achieve nothing...

I hope he eventually drops his pride and starts to understand things a little better.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2006 08:57 PM

Wait wait wait. 8 years = 8 months? Huh? Bush had 8 months to "try" and get Bin Laden and he's complaining because we're angry at him for "trying" for 8 years?

Huh?

Posted by: Gozer [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2006 09:37 PM

I'm sorry, I didn't get the memo. What is Bill's definition of the word "tried" this week?

I am still trying to figure out what the meaning of is, is.

Posted by: Vero at September 22, 2006 09:46 PM

LOL~HaHahahaaaaa hahaha

It is rather comical watching him try to lie himself out of this!!
The blame lay squarely on his shoulders, No doubt!!

He says "I TRIED", LOL, LIAR, LIAR, SET YOUR PANTS ON FIIIRRE!! HAAAAAAAAAHAAHAHAAA What did he mean?, perhaps when he was with miss lewinski?

It is REALLY pathetic, REALLY, REALLY PATHETIC AND MADDENING the CORRUPTION that Bill Clinton hath wrought upon American soil, along with sick face hillary.

May they turn towards God before His final return!!


Jeremiah

Posted by: Jeremiah [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 22, 2006 09:50 PM

Another bunch of lies from the nation's worst liar ("I did not have sex with Monica Lewinsky.") He needs to admit his mistakes and learn from them, and not deny them. Hopefully this will have a negative impact on his wife's presidential campaign in '08!

Posted by: Carter at September 22, 2006 10:36 PM

what the h*ll is he talking about??? we condemmed him for trying too hard???????????
he would be smarter to just stop talking..he keeps digging the hole deeper and deeper..
a good thing!!!!

Posted by: Xango Annie at September 22, 2006 10:51 PM

Its de ja vu of him pointing about Monica. Maybe its a subliminal message to Monica. Please come back to me!

Posted by: Tina at September 22, 2006 11:38 PM

A useless life? Hmm..President Clinton, or at least "Mr. Clinton" (how would you like it if I called the current president "George"?) is raising billions for worthy causes around the world as we speak. Those who call him worthless display only their own ignorance, hatred, and bigotry.

(PS This will never be posted - I'm only writing to you, dear moderator...)

Posted by: Chris at September 23, 2006 12:13 AM

A useless life? Hmm..President Clinton, or at least "Mr. Clinton" (how would you like it if I called the current president "George"?) is raising billions for worthy causes around the world as we speak. Those who call him worthless display only their own ignorance, hatred, and bigotry.

(PS This will never be posted - I'm only writing to you, dear censor...)

Posted by: Chris at September 23, 2006 12:14 AM

I did not have sexual relations with that women, Monica Lewinski. Yada, Yada, Yada...

How many times do we have to be bombed before you take someone serious?

Posted by: Tom at September 23, 2006 12:31 AM

Err.. Chris? How many times are you gonna write that comment.

I can understand your frustration.

The Clinton Presidency, much like his democrat predecessor Dhimmi Carter, will go down as one of the worst failed presidencies with regard to foreign policy in the 20th century.

Posted by: Leo Pusateri at September 23, 2006 12:43 AM

Err.. Chris? How many times are you gonna write that comment.

I can understand your frustration.

The Clinton Presidency, much like his democrat predecessor Dhimmi Carter, will go down as one of the worst failed presidencies with regard to foreign policy in the 20th century.

Posted by: Psycmeistr [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 12:44 AM

It IS clear what was done and not done and history WILL show what these chickenhawks were (not) doing in the eight months before 9/11. The real tragedy though lies in what they've failed to do since 9/11.
The billions of campaign dollars and the tidal waves of lies and fearmongering coming out of Washington won't save their asses this time.

Posted by: Mike at September 23, 2006 12:53 AM

"Those who call him worthless display only their own ignorance, hatred, and bigotry.
'>

Depends on what the meaning of "own" is

Posted by: Paul at September 23, 2006 12:54 AM

Chris,

Yes, a useless life - a great deal of noise, signifying nothing.

He's done nothing - his charitible works are not of his origination, he just lends the prestige of a former President being involved.

His whole life is a gigantic calculation - entirely about how to serve the pride and appetites of William Jefferson Clinton, and nothing else.

He could have done so much more - and he can still do so much more...but he'll first have to drop his pride.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 03:24 AM

Clinton lied, people died. WTC 1, Khobar towers, USS Cole, and his lack of action is mostly responsible for 9-11. Yeah, I'd say pretty useless, and definately a failed presidency.

Posted by: arcman [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 08:27 AM

Over on Drudge there is a report that:

"Osama bin Laden may have died of typhoid in Pakistan a month ago"

No 72 virgins for him if this is true.

Posted by: Mel Evenson [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 09:42 AM

Clinton lied, people died.

No, arcman, the phrase should read: "Clinton played, and over 3,000 Americans paid."

A useless life? Hmm..President Clinton, or at least "Mr. Clinton" (how would you like it if I called the current president "George"?) is raising billions for worthy causes around the world as we speak.

Uh, Chris? "George" would be a marked improvement over what most of you asshats call him, while he is in office!!!

As for Slick Blue-Dress and the "billions" he's raising, all I can say is "better late than never." Didn't he apologize to the African people for doing nothing for them while he was too busy doing Monica?

He had eight years, and he "tried." "George," on the other hand, had eight months? Hardly! Lest we forget, following Al Al-Gore's attempt to steal the 2000 election, there was much DemoCRAP obstruction, and "George" didn't get his full cabinet in place until sometime late Summer 2001.

Yes, maybe "George" could've done more, but he only had eight days!

Now excuse me; I need to take a DemoCRAP...I mean, a dump. Ah, what's the difference, they smell the same...

Posted by: keefer [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 10:33 AM

Noonan" "He says we on the right condemned him for trying too hard to capture bin Laden?...Very strange man"

If you remember, Mark, when Clinton launched missile attacks against Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and Sudan, the Republicans in congress howled. The Repubs screamed that Clinton's attacks against a bunch of nobodies that no one cares about were just a distraction from their *really important* business: obsessing over the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

Oh how soon we forget - especially when history can be confortable fictions. Face it, the Bushies never cared a wit about the threat of terrorism or about al-qaeda until after the 9/11 attacks afforded them a tool to win elections.

In the summer of 2001, a bi-partisan commission, headed by former Senators Gary Hart and Republican Warren Rudman, released its final report, thge result of an exahustive multi-year assessment, on the grave threat posed by al-qaeda and other terrorists. The report siad there was a strong likihood of a terrorist attack that could kill thousands, possibly using commercial aviation. The Bush administration reacted by trying to shove the report under the carpet, since it distracted threat attention away from their then number one priority: a multi-billion dollar corporate welfare boondoggle know as SDI. The threat from muslims terrorists was not glamorous enough for the Bushies - it didn't allow for enormous pork outlays on big-ticket hardware built by their corporate donors. *That* was the focus of the Bushies pre-9/11

Posted by: Aarontime [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 10:35 AM

The Clinton Presidency, much like his democrat predecessor Dhimmi Carter, will go down as one of the worst failed presidencies with regard to foreign policy in the 20th century.

This is already sort of funny in its hyperbole, but when you take into account that this is an ardent Bush supporter trying to call another president--and his foreign policy in particular--"one of the worst," it really pushes the Unintentional Comedy rating sky-high. Leo's uninformed anger plus Noonan's sadly transparent bitterness equals some quality laughs.

Posted by: SeesThroughIt at September 23, 2006 03:27 PM

You guys seriously need to get help. Clinton will go down as one of one of the worst foreign policy administrations? Read SOME BOOKS. Just one a year will probably do, and I don't mean a 3 times folded piece of paper, I mean history books. If you think Clinton had a bad presidency you obviously can't rememeber anything except "democrats = bad, republicans = good, durrrrrrr."

Posted by: Steve at September 23, 2006 03:55 PM

Good thing SDI continuued - it's CURRENT testing shows we can probably thwart a North Korean attack.

Maybe though, we should let them hit Democrat Cities arseontime?

Posted by: Kahn [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 04:25 PM

By the way.... actually it's been Bush that has been trying and Clinton who let OBL walk away several times.

Bush at lest managed to push OBL into a cave, kill or capture most of his aids and argely make him irrelevant.

Posted by: Kahn [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2006 06:16 PM

Maybe though, we should let them hit Democrat Cities arseontime?

Demand people decry violence against Republicans, then advocate violence against Democrats. Mmm-hmm.

Posted by: SeesThroughIt at September 24, 2006 02:37 PM

One thing that Clinton pointed out in the interview,and I have said it over and over and over again and again, but I have YET to hear anyone ask about the Bush failure on it:

He had three months (Oct. 2000-Jan. 2001) to do anything about the Cole.

And if he had done anything right away in Oct. we'd still be hearing today about how it was a conspiracy to bring about the Gore Presidency, and if he had in November we'd have heard about how it was some trick to get Gore elected in the recount-- don't deny that you guys wouldn't have said that, because I know you better than that.

But in any case, George Bush had eight months to do something about the Cole. So why doesn't anyone ever blame Bush for that?

Posted by: Eli Blake [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 25, 2006 02:12 AM

Eli,

The trail was rather cold by January, wasn't it?

Shoot me your blog link - I've got Battle Born up and you and I need to start a long-term argument...

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 25, 2006 02:23 AM

Never mind - got it.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 25, 2006 02:24 AM

Please report any inappropriate comments to abuse (at) blogsforbush (dot) com. Be sure to include the title of the blog entry, the name of the commenter, and the text of the offending comment.

Post a comment




Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)