







|

According to an article from yesterday's Roll Call, Democrats are still planning to filibuster Bolton's renomination as ambassador to the U.N.
Last night I was sent a collection of quotes from articles and op-eds on John Bolton's performance at the UN. I've posted them in the extended (sorry, no links).
The New York Times, February 26, 2006:
When it comes to reforming the disgraceful United Nations Human Rights Commission, America's ambassador, John Bolton, is right; Secretary General Kofi Annan is wrong; and leading international human rights groups have unwisely put their preference for multilateral consensus ahead of their duty to fight for the strongest possible human rights protection.
Three cheers for America's U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, who this week proved himself a staunch defender of human rights. He all but shipwrecked the proposed U.N. Human Rights Council as a phony attempt to reform the hopeless U.N. Commission on Human Rights, which is charged with monitoring and condemning human rights violations around the world.- The Washington Post, Senator George V. Voinovich, July 20, 2006:
For the good of our country, the United Nations and the free world, we must end any ambiguity about whether John Bolton speaks for the United States so that he can work to support our interests at the United Nations during this critical time.
Voinovich is right. Bolton went to the UN having to prove himself. He's done that.
How ironic it would be if Bolton, whose nomination as ambassador Senate Democrats tried to block with bogus charges about his temper and treatment of co-workers, were honored as a peacemaker. Truth is, the Democrats feared Bolton's ability and determination to clean up one of their favorite institutions, the U.N.
And let us not lose sight of the yeoman work of oft-criticized U.S. Ambassador John Bolton - he of abrasive mien and undiplomatic verbiage....For their hard work, the U.S. delegation, headed by Bolton, is to be congratulated, especially by the people who are first in the line of fire: the people of Seoul. They would be the ones most at risk if in the end diplomacy fails. Every bit as much as war, diplomacy can be a matter of life and death - for a people, for a city, and for hope.
In addition to being straightforward, one of the clearest signals you get from Bolton (and one of the reasons I think many Democrats in the United States Senate opposed his nomination) is that he isn't remotely shy or apologetic about promoting America's agenda and defending her interests.
As U.S. Ambassador John Bolton has implored, the Security Council must send a strong and unanimous signal that North Korea's missile test-launch was unacceptable. The Bush administration, while condemning North Korea's actions, is attempting to seek a diplomatic solution, which is a wise course.
…Bolton has demonstrated his ability to be an effective UN ambassador, championing the much-needed message of reform. He brought a fresh perspective to the United Nations, and the criticism voiced by Voinovich and Democrats—that he didn’t play well with others—has proven to be moot.
John Bolton, former undersecretary of state, has with unusual energy tried to find ways to counter this threat. Friends and foes agree -- he never gives up. He has repeatedly underlined the threat of Iran pursuing two paths to nuclear weapons: One is the use of highly enriched uranium, achieved by thousands of centrifuges, which Iran has developed and tested.
It is commendable, then, that the Bush administration is starting to get serious about Darfur. At the United Nations, John Bolton is pushing for authorization of a more muscular U.N. force to take over for the African Union (AU), while the State Department is trying to get NATO to increase its logistical support. Both efforts are worthy.
Posted by Matt at July 26, 2006 05:56 AM

Trackback Pings
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Filibuster of Bolton Expected:
Blog-o-Fascists linked with Filibuster of Bolton Expected
Blogs for Bush: The White House Of The Blogosphere According to an article from yesterday's Roll Call, Democrats are still planning to filibuster Bolton's renomination as ambassador to the U.N. Last night I was sent a collection of quotes fro...
[Read More]Tracked on July 26, 2006 07:15 AM

Don't believe a filibuster will work. If November wasn't so close, it might, but any donk up for re-election will pee down both legs at the thought of being outed as an obstructionist who is hurting America's ability to function in this very dangerous world - especially in the leftist holy temple of the UN. They will wimp out, after much blabber and bluster, and floor dramatics.
Man, I hope and pray the 'Rats try this. The guy has done a great job, these are challenging times and voters will see this filibuster exactly for what it is. Political partisanship on the part of the 'Rats (what else is new?) so that they can try to take control of congress.
At least their foolishness is consistent. Consistently putting their political fortunes ahead of my family's security.
As for Steve's security, who gives a crap...
Bring it on!
Bring it on!