Blogs for Bush Team
Matt Margolis, Founder/Editor
Russ Emerson, Webmaster
Mark Noonan, Senior Writer
Kevin Patrick, Senior Writer
Paul Lewis, Senior Writer

News Tips

Guest Bloggers
Sister Toldjah

Blogroll For Bush


Above are the 43 most recently updated blogs. Click here for the full blogroll

Allies


Archives
Categories

B4B Coverage Of...
The 2004 Republican National Convention
The Alito Nomination
The Roberts Nomination
The Roberts Hearings
Hurricane Katrina

Recent Posts
Independence Day
Barack Obama
Raising the Stakes in Gaza
Independence Day
Independence Day
Hamdan: Null and Void?
That Genius Kerry
Open Thread: 4th of July Weekend
Bush's Birthday is Coming Up...
Teaching Hamas a Lesson
Bush Goes On Offense On War, Illegal Leaks
A Curious Offer
Al Qaeda Granted Geneva Convention Protections By Supreme Court
Democrats Fear The Issues
Economy Grows At 5.6% First Quarter
Help Wish President Bush A Happy 60th Birthday
Swift Boat Vets Get Harassed
Unload Your Oil Futures
What Media Bias? Part 52
The Flag Burning Amendment


Margolis Media Works

Add to My Yahoo!


CentCom

GOP Bloggers

Thank you, President Bush

Social Security Information



Blogs for Bush Store





Search The Grand Old Portal

Donate to Blogs For Bush to help keep us blogging!
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Prime Sponsor

Visit Our Sponsors!


Visit Our Sponsors!



Subscribe To B4Bcast!


Site Credits
RSS 2.0

Powered by:
Movable Type 3.2

Design by:






June 28, 2006
Sore Loserman

Al Gore strikes again:

Al Gore charges that President George Bush has "broken the law” and implies that Congress should have initiated impeachment proceedings against Bush for unspecified crimes.

In a fund-raising e-mail sent out under the banner of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee with the subject line "Unprecedented,” Gore declares:

"The evidence now makes it hard to avoid the conclusion that George Bush has repeatedly and insistently broken the law and the corrupt Republican Congress has shirked its constitutional duty to hold him to account."

While Gore omitted using the "i" word, the consititutional remedy for a president who breaks the law is the House's impeachment process followed by a trial before the Senate.

"In my view, a president who breaks the law poses a threat to the very foundation of our democracy," Gore said...

Yeah, threat to the very foundation of our democracy - unless the President in question is your boss, and you've extracted from him a promise of support for your 2000 Presidential bid, thus shunting Hillary off to the Senate until 2008.

On a serious note, Al Gore has been showing himself to be an increasingly nasty and mean-spirited man. There is a great deal of bitterness - the bitterness of a gangster who thinks himself robbed. Point blank, it was Al Gore who tried to steal the 2000 election - it is well to remember that in the last couple weeks of that campaign it was the Gore people who were talking up how legitimate an electoral win is even if the winner lost the popular vote...in Missouri, Oregon, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Florida there was plenty of indicators of vote-manufacturing on election night. Gore's people just blew it by a few hundred votes in Florida, thus costing Gore his stolen victory...and he's never forgiven President Bush for not rolling over to Gore's plans for theft.

All of this bitterness and hatred - all of it the result of Democrats who felt that after Clinton slipped in to the White House in 1992 that their universe was back in place...a Democrat was in charge, and a Democrat would remain in charge for all time to come. The 12 year long Reagan-Bush nightmare was over! But then comes the Younger Bush, and he snatches it all away from them. An unforgivable crime...

I do hope that some day, at least some of these people will wake up and realise that bitterness isn't the way to live - I hope, in short, that some of them will grow up and understand that the universe doesn't revolve around them...that there are other people in this world who both disagree with tme and have a right to a seat at the table.

Posted by Mark Noonan at June 28, 2006 05:25 AM



Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.blogsforbush.com/mt/whitehouse.cgi/7393

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sore Loserman:

Conservative Outpost linked with Daily Summary
NEWS: - Five Big Cases Await Supreme Court Rulings This Week - Bush Calls on Senate to Pass Line-Item Veto - A Single Person Could Swing an Election - Can Daily Kos Control Dems? - Top Court Upholds most of...
[Read More]

Tracked on June 28, 2006 11:31 AM

Comments

Gore has never gotten over his defeat, and still harbors a desire to be President. He is pandering to the far left side of the democrats, in hopes that after a deadlock at the convention, when Hillary falls short of the nomination, Gore can be resurected as the compromise candidate to regain the White House.

The dems are just wacky enough to go for it.

Posted by: phnxbmed at June 28, 2006 08:10 AM

Ain't gonna happen, not with Algore and the Kos Kidz.

Posted by: Macker [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 09:11 AM


Al Gore invented the internet..he was the subject of the movie "Love Story. Now he should make a movie and the title should be " How i became an idiot"

Posted by: Wendy at June 28, 2006 09:31 AM

There is no negotiations

Mark Maw Most odorous amigo....You and I have been to the very same school of gramatical thought. I salute you.

Posted by: HugeWangUSAF [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 09:57 AM

Gore is the most pathetic American alive.

Posted by: Ames Tiedeman at June 28, 2006 10:38 AM

"I hope, in short, that some of them will grow up and understand that the universe doesn't revolve around them...that there are other people in this world who both disagree with them and have a right to a seat at the table."

Are u kidding me? Try taking your own advice.....

Posted by: morphie at June 28, 2006 10:53 AM

Mark,

The bitterness comes from him sending 2500 Americans to their death, and countless iraqis for a war we had no business being in, maybe if he had done his job and secured Afghanistan, and caught OBL, we would have let him slide.

See you at the impeachment hearings. LOL

Posted by: Third Eye Open [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 11:08 AM

TEO,

No, the bitterness comes from Gore's failed attempt at stealing the 2000 elections...upon this bit of BS, you on the left have decided to weave an absurd anti-war stance...pretending that you oppose the war (which you really don't give a damn about, one way or the other), when all you really oppose is President Bush.

We're on to you, you understand?

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 11:54 AM

Deleted - Off Topic

Posted by: Barneyg2000 [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 11:54 AM

Mark,

I pity fools such as yourself.

You have no facts to back-up any of the conjecture you present, so instead of shining-up your crystal ball which guides your opinion on policy.

I would ask you what it feels like to wake-up and realize you're nothing more than entertainment, but I don't think you would recognize what you are anyways.

Posted by: Third Eye Open [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 12:10 PM

Mark,

I pity fools such as yourself.

You have no facts to back-up any of the conjecture you present, so instead of shining-up your crystal ball which guides your opinion on policy, try thinking...just make sure to stop when it hurts

I would ask you what it feels like to wake-up and realize you're nothing more than entertainment, but I don't think you would recognize what you are anyways.

Posted by: Third Eye Open [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 12:13 PM

Barney

You raise an interesting point. It should have become apparent from the beginning that the military is not large enough to meet the current threats we face that we should have worked to increase the size of the military long ago. Senator John McCain thinks the administration made a mistake in not calling for an increase in the size of the military after 911. I agree with him. I think it was last year when the Senator made those statements. At the time he said this, he felt we could still do it. I hope he is right. Leaving Saddam in power seems to be inconsistent with winning the war against terrorism. As I have said before, the war in Iraq may have been misguided. Perhaps Saddam could have been contained some other way. In any event, it should have become apparent long ago that we need to increase the size of the military. We need to give them the tools they need to win. I hope the Colonel will push for increases in the size of the military and for better equipment for the soldiers who are fighting for our national survival.

Posted by: B.Poster [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 01:53 PM

TEShut...there is no such word as ....anyways...
anyway.........take a good look at Albore...he reminds me of a Russian Commikrat..that curl in the lips..those hooded eyes...those eyes are dead..there is no life in them....very telling...

Posted by: Xango Annie at June 28, 2006 02:21 PM

Xango,

I'm from the south, we use funny words like 'y'all' and 'gunna'. Sorry if this confuses you, i'll try and correct such faux-pas' in the future.

Have you ever noticed Bush looks like a muppet-weasel, those dark, in-set eyes, the pointy face, tensed jaw...kinda scary

Posted by: Third Eye Open [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 03:34 PM

TEO,

You've been getting rather personally insulting towards the writers on this blog lately - I urge you to stop that...we really don't provide a blog so that we may be insulted by people who disagree with us.

Please actually address the issues of the blog without taking pot-shots at the writers who spend their time, gratis, providing you with content to read.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 04:34 PM

keefer

Posted by: Ash [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 06:05 PM

Ash,

Keefer doesn't offer insult to the writers of the blog...you know, the people that pay for it and do all the writing...you're in our house, show a little respect...or leave, if you don't like us that much.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 08:38 PM

TEShut..southern speech never confuses me. In fact, I am never confused!!
and ya know what???? a lot of women I know..ones that even you would consider "hot"
think the POTUS is a hunk!!!!!!!

Posted by: Xango Annie at June 28, 2006 08:49 PM

"Al Gore has been showing himself to be an increasingly nasty and mean-spirited man"

Al Gore is a man??????????????????

Posted by: Bob at June 28, 2006 09:52 PM

Mark- Actually the entire premise of the article-that congress routinely impeaches presidents who break the law is false. There is a choice to call for a censure instead, as Sen Feingold did recently. But if Gore suggested it , I'd gp for it-he was right about the war and right about global warming. Just think where we'd be if Gore had been our president for the last five years.

Posted by: kritter [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 28, 2006 10:37 PM

Ash,
Keefer doesn't offer insult to the writers of the blog...you know, the people that pay for it and do all the writing...you're in our house, show a little respect...or leave, if you don't like us that much.

Mark,

No need to get so huffy. I did not understand your distinction between between the writers of this blog (i.e. you and Matt) and the writers of this blog (i.e. TEO, Kimberly, A-10, keefer, maf).

I have said before: I realize this is your blog and you can do whatever you want with it. Including banning me if you chose. But don't do it based on a misunderstanding.

Posted by: Ash [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 29, 2006 01:33 AM

Bitterness and hatred Mark? What exactly do you base this on? Everytime I have seen him in an interview, he is polite, composed and very logical and well spoken.

The problem you really have with him is that you see Gore and deep down inside you, you wish that President Bush could be more like Gore, instead of a clumsy, poorly spoken, gramitically incorrect and illogical texas-wannabe hick. Why hes not even a real Texan.

I can also say that had Gore won in 2000, which he would have if the Supreme Court not stopped the legal recount, America would without question have a number of victories in its hat, instead of the failure after failure after failure that is the Bush administrations track record and legacy.

Say what you will of Gore, but I can say with 100% certainty that Gore would not have had a failed presidency like dubya has.

Posted by: axis [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 29, 2006 02:09 AM

Axis,

Well, as a Canadian, I guess you are excused from knowing that by any means Gore was attempting a recount, President Bush would still have come out on top...they just didn't stuff the ballot boxes quite enough for him, I guess.

As for whom I wish President Bush were like...that is nonsense. I write for a blog called Blogs for Bush: it is a certainty that I hold President Bush in high esteem.

As it is, he's miles ahead of Gore both in intellect and courage...Gore mangles his syntax as much as President Bush...indeed, we all do, its just that the MSM got itself a hook, and you've fallen for it...rather gullible of you, but then again, you are a leftist and that is just a bit of same/same.

Posted by: Mark Noonan [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 29, 2006 02:53 AM

"As it is, he's miles ahead of Gore both in intellect and courage...Gore mangles his syntax as much as President Bush...indeed, we all do, its just that the MSM got itself a hook, and you've fallen for it..."

LOL! And you've fallen for 'flip flop','cut & run' , etc. etc.....

Posted by: morphie at June 29, 2006 09:42 AM

Mark,

Sorry if I got under your skin, sometimes I go overboard when one of the pets around here get uppity, but i suppose that is what seperates us from a place like Iraq or Iran, i'm thankful you tolerate idjits like myself, keep it up, and ill keep bustin your chops, ciao

Posted by: Third Eye Open [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 29, 2006 10:13 AM

Mark,

The bitterness comes from him sending 2500 Americans to their death, and countless iraqis for a war we had no business being in, maybe if he had done his job and secured Afghanistan, and caught OBL, we would have let him slide.

See you at the impeachment hearings. LOL

Posted by: Third Eye Open at June 28, 2006 11:08 AM

Yah, like we believe you give a rats a.. about the soldiers lib! Your effin stupid!

Posted by: bearmanUSMC [TypeKey Profile Page] at June 29, 2006 12:35 PM

"In my view, a president who breaks the law poses a threat to the very foundation of our democracy," Gore said...

Clearly Al Gore does not think that a VICE "...president who breaks the law poses a threat to the very foundation of our democracy,"

Because I distinctly remember Gore using Federal funds, via his office in the White House and his Vice Presidential aides, plus government phones, to solicit funds for the Democratic Party. Illegal, my dear Gore. And it was Gore soliciting funds from foreign nationals, most famously in an apearance in front of a group of Bhuddist nuns in San Francisico.

(Should Gore go on to pontificate against lying, we can discuss his many claims that he did not know the San Fran appearance was a fund-raiser---till a copy of his schedule and e-mail were unearthed, where he referenced not being able to attend another function because of his previous commitment to a fund-raiser in San Francisco.)

I don't remember Gore registering any complaint at all at any of Clinton's many law-breaking escapades, from his warrantless searches of white supremacist compounds after the OKC bombing to the illegal imprisonment of Ho Wen Lee to the slaughter at Waco to giving Johnny Huang top secret clearance (over the objections of all the U.S. intelligence agencies) and inviting him to sit in on Pentagon briefings, to taking money from China. Maybe this sensitivity to law-breaking is new, part of Gore---The Sequel, Part 9.

Posted by: Almiranta [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 1, 2006 06:34 PM

Let me see---Al Zarqawi was only one man, and killing him could not have the slightest effect on the war because after all, he was only one man. But Osama? Well, Osama may just be one man, but he is so grand, so important, so amazingly powerful, that we simply cannot claim the slightest bit of progress while he is still free.

Free, slinking from cave to cave, issuing pleas for more money from the ex-followers who think he is a weenie for hiding out instead of fighting, reduced to sending video tapes that include only an old still photo of him. Wow. If we need any more proof that Osama's a has-been, just look at how he is reduced to stealing taliking points from the Donks. Can't get much lower than that.

Third Eye Dripping is evidently arguing that we should either kill OBL, thereby elevating him to something approaching his prior status by making him a martyr, or capturing him, putting him back on the world stage a la Sadaam and setting up a real mess of hostage takings, retaliatory raids, and so on. And he will deny that he is rooting for anything that will harm the U.S. war effort? Yeah, right.

No, as long as Osama is a feeble old man, scurrying from cave to cave, out of the picture, and out of power, the ooozing eye and his cronies are fit to be tied. This is too effective a strategery---they want thins stirred up, a real mess, so they will have something they can relate to. They just go intso absolute SPASMS of indignation when Bush says he doesn't think much about Osama. Not think about him? Ignore him? Ignore their HERO?? But THEY think of nothing ELSE!!

But of course the concept of neutralizing an enemy is way too subtle for these simpletons.

Posted by: Almiranta [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 1, 2006 06:47 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?
(you may use HTML tags for style)