I planned ahead! I taped my bumper stickers to my inside back window, and they're still in pretty good shape.

...and let me tell you there's nothing like cutting off a driver with a Kerry bumper sticker, so that W and Bush Cheney '04 stare right back at them and remind them of what losers they and their party are.

man, just pull off the W one too. so many of us these days throw up in our mouths when we see those...save us the inconvenience

I don't like bumper stickers at all, no matter what the message is. Too much of a pain to scrape off. I feel like I'm vandalizing my own car.

One of the bumper stickers on my S-10 reads "If the answer is Kerry, it must've been a stupid question." It's still in good shape and may last through the '08 election season. Now if only the S-10 lasts that long. For the '04 season, I used white shoe poslish and painted pro-Bush, anti-left slogans all over the truck. Got lots of "thumbs-up," and the occasional one-finger salute. Also, I had people follow me into stores to compliment the rolling billboard.

I don't recommend this if your vehicle is your primary mode of transportation--after about nine months of use as a billboard, my fairway green truck now has whites flecks throughout. I only use the truck for hauling nowadays, but I may have to break her out next year, so's I can piss off some more lefties here in my blue state.

Instead of bumper stickers why not wear t-shirts? My collection has just hit 30

Keefer: You crack me up!

CJ: Thanks for the link.

I've got some great bumper stickers for the GOP.

Take a look-

"I admit it -- the liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures."
William Kristol, The New Yorker, 5/22/95

IRAQ
"The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason" , Paul Wolfowitz, Vanity Fair, 2003

(I think this one will work well in securing the Native American vote for the GOP)

"The American Indians were meaner to themselves than anybody was ever mean to them. The people were savages. It’s true, they damn well were … these people were out there destroying timber, they were out there conquering and killing each other, scalping people." - Rush Limbaugh

"I think "one man, one vote," just unrestricted democracy, would not be wise. There needs to be some kind of protection for the minority which the white people represent now, a minority, and they need and have a right to demand a protection of their rights."
-- Pat Robertson, The 700 Club television program, March 18, 1992, suggesting that South African white people's votes ought to count more than other votes because they are in the minority

"I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans should be concerned about this…What do you want me to do, go over and kiss the camera?" –on ABC's "Good Morning America," making good on his promise to publicly apologize if weapons of mass destruction were not found Iraq, Feb. 10, 2004

"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." Donald Rumsfeld –on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction

That we are to stand by the president, right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.
~Theodore Roosevelt

"Our enemies...never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
~George W. Bush

"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is."
~George W. Bush
(About the quote: The future president said this in regard to Kosovo in April 1999.)

"I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." --Vice President Dick Cheney, on the Iraq insurgency, June 20, 2005

"I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down." --Bill Bennett, former Education Secretary and author of "The Book of Virtues," Sept. 28, 2005

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

"You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." --President Bush, to a divorced mother of three in Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005

"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job." --President Bush, to FEMA director Michael Brown, while touring hurricane-ravaged Mississippi, Sept. 2, 2005

"Now tell me the truth boys, is this kind of fun?" --House Majority Leader Tom Delay (R-TX), to three young hurricane evacuees from New Orleans at the Astrodome in Houston, Sept. 9, 2005

"What I'm hearing which is sort of scary is that they all want to stay in Texas. Everybody is so overwhelmed by the hospitality. And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway so this (chuckle) – this is working very well for them." --Former First Lady Barbara Bush, on the hurricane evacuees at the Astrodome in Houston, Sept. 5, 2005

And if none of those strikes your fancy as a good bumper sticker, then how about you paste that picture of George W. Bush giving what he called "just a one finger salute" to America in your car window. I think that would accurately express the GOPs feelings toward the majority of this country.

I think Mark Levin's slogan was best suited for a bumper sticker, and may well have been for all I know:

Did you vote for John Kerry?
Then you are a LOSER!

I think that would accurately express the GOPs feelings toward the majority of this country.

Nah--just 48 percent of the country, you losers who voted for Lurch Spitball Kerry...

Keefer-

48% ?

LOL

more like

67%
isn't it?

Do your math. He was Mr. 33% last time I checked. And with those numbers you can't deny there's alot of Ex-Bushies out there nursing a serious case of buyer's remorse.

ROTFLMAO!!!

Keefer-

48% ???????

LOL

It's more like

67%
isn't it?

Do your math. He was Mr. 33% last time I checked. And with those numbers you can't deny there's alot of Ex-Bushies out there nursing a serious case of buyer's remorse.

ROTFLMAO!!!

Keefer-

Yes that was so nice I just had to post it twice.

LOL

Maybe Bush will lose that 3rd term eh? Good Lord are these left wing kooks dumb!

CJ,

Oh so you think that Bush's overwhelming popularity is helping his party in the congress??

Poll: Dems Have 2006 Advantage
Bush, Republican Congress Show Nearly Record Low Ratings

"Congressional Republicans get an eviscerating review in this poll. The GOP gets a favorability rating of 37%, exactly 20 percentage points lower than where it was in 1994. Inversely, Democrats in Congress had a favorability rating increase of 11 percentage points over what it was in 1994. "

Bush's troubles are party wide.
Good Lord these Regressives are blind!

I think it is a sign of American style individuality to leave political bumper stickers on the car at least 10 years after the fact.

In your case, a Bush-Cheney bumper sticker will be a real Ebay item when Cheney is convicted to "life" in prison for high crimes and treason.

The polls also showed dems with a lead in 2002 and 2004. Good Lord, are all left wing kooks as intellectually challenged as leftorium?

CJ: The answer to both of your questions is "yes". :-)

I have to admit I just peeled off my Kerry bumper sticker prior to reading this thread. I left it on so no one thought I was dumb enough to vote for Bush in 2004. Fool me once.....

Oh, and I have replaced it with O bama in '08.

*Chuckles*

Like I said I ended up selling my car that had all the bumper stickers on it. The only bumper sticker I have that could be construded as political would be my NRA member stickers.

My giant Ghostbusters logo just confirms my nerd status. As does my two Megatokyo bumper stickers. :)

Yes that was so nice I just had to post it twice.

Yeah, okay. We'll just let that one go...not! You posted it twice because you are too stupid to read the error message.

And by the way, what are President Kerry's poll numbers these days, bacterium? What, he's not the president? Oh, that's right, 48 percent.

Ash-tray, you spelled "Osama" wrong...

Obama '08??

What has this guy ever done besides give a speech?
But then again you donks have always been for style over substance.

Ash, you misspelled "Osama."

Leftorium....Kerry's numbers still are less than Bush's. So are Congress's.

Lefty...tell me when the last time a Democrat got over 50% of the vote in this country for President.

I'll give you a hint...it was over 30 years ago.

"Osama bin … Osama … Obama" - Edward "Leave 'em on the Riverbed Ted" Kennedy

Wienernation-

I'll give you a hint. All those Democrats were elected in legitimate races and none; I repeat NONE had to be APPOINTED, NOT ELECTED to the office.

And since we're going back 30 years or so here’s a little Jeopardy question for you. Which party has had the only president to resign in disgrace? Here's a hint " I am not a crook!!".
Love the way they spin and gloss over that one on those Republican Party history sites.

LMAO

I'll take Nixon for a thousand, Alex. Remember Nixon? No friend of the conservatives? Nixon, who split the party in 1964 giving the Presidency to the War Criminal Johnson? Nixon who normalized relations with the hated Chinese? Nixon who discouraged conservatives from voting through two elections?

And for the bonus round, what party claims the only President impeached in the 20th Century?

Rathaven_

"Nixon, who split the party in 1964 giving the Presidency to the War Criminal Johnson? Nixon who normalized relations with the hated Chinese? Nixon who discouraged conservatives from voting through two elections?"

That's a gut buster that is !!!
LMAO
Memo from Ken Melman:
NIXON- THE NON-CONSERVATIVE, CONSERVATIVE.

You guy's keep on trying to bury that guy's rotting, stinking corpse.
LMAO

"And for the bonus round, what party claims the only President impeached in the 20th Century? "

I'll take that. Is it the former President Bill Clinton who, all polling data shows, the country prefers to the current president? Bill Clinton who has an overall higher job approval rating than George Bush? Bill Clinton who took us from budget deficits to a budget surplus?

Choke on this:

Job approval numbers for President Bill Clinton
Gallup Poll
9/14-15/98 Approve 63% Disapprove 35% Unsure 2%

That's at the height of your beloved impeachment!

LMAO

Rathaven_

"Nixon, who split the party in 1964 giving the Presidency to the War Criminal Johnson? Nixon who normalized relations with the hated Chinese? Nixon who discouraged conservatives from voting through two elections?"

That's a gut buster that is !!!
LMAO
Memo from Ken Melman:
NIXON- THE NON-CONSERVATIVE, CONSERVATIVE.

You guy's keep on trying to bury that guy's rotting, stinking corpse.
LMAO

"And for the bonus round, what party claims the only President impeached in the 20th Century? "

I'll take that. Is it the former President Bill Clinton who, all polling data shows, the country prefers to the current president? Bill Clinton who has an overall higher job approval rating than George Bush? Bill Clinton who took us from budget deficits to a budget surplus?

Choke on this:

Job approval numbers for President Bill Clinton
Gallup Poll
9/14-15/98 Approve 63% Disapprove 35% Unsure 2%

That's at the height of your beloved impeachment!

LMAO

Leftor,
Give us just one thing, just one idea, one proposal, one suggestion that Clinton had that benefited the economy.

If it's popularity contests you want; Presidential Election 1972, Nixon the liberal republican = 77,829,554 to McGovern liberal democrat = 1,278,260. Electoral College Everyone for Nixon, Massachusetts for McGovern. Gee, does that make the disgraced Nixon even better, and more popular than Clinton?

You have a strange definition of success.

Bane-
"You have a strange definition of success."

AND YOU HAVE A STRANGE DEFINITION OF THE TRUTH.

GOD YOU CONSERVATIVES MAKE THIS TOO EASY!!!!

Obviously you may not have been alive in 1972 or you may think that no one on this board was but I assure you I was around then and I know differently.

Bane, you owe us all a RETRACTION AND A CORRECTION. Until you do you I won't let up on you. I don't mind skewed opinions but when you completely lie about a fact then I will call you on it. If you’re going to post an election result at least do yourself and us the favor of being ACURATE!!!!
Has PATHOLOGICAL LYING become a way of life for you guys on the RIGHT?
YOU DON"T EVEN CARE IF YOU GET CAUGHT IT SEEMS.
THE RIGHT NEVER GETS IT WRONG. HOW CAN THEY? THEY JUST MAKE IT UP!!!
Did you think we couldn't check up on your numbers?

YOU LIED!!!!

"Presidential Election 1972, Nixon the liberal republican = 77,829,554 to McGovern liberal democrat = 1,278,260. Electoral College Everyone for Nixon, Massachusetts for McGovern., does that make the disgraced Nixon even better, and more popular than Clinton?"

Now I know what it is you're trying to do here. You want to make Nixon look like this absolutely spectacularly loved candidate in order to show how opinion polls don't matter when it comes to their true selves. The rational would be Clinton wasn't so great just because of his high approval ratings. Fine. Perfectly valid argument and to a great extent I can agree. Why then did you feel the need to LIE to prove your point?

First let's take your Nixon number, you said he got 77,829,554 votes.

THAT"S A LIE

The actual number was 47,168,710 votes or 60.67% of the vote
You were only off by 30,660,844 votes
I have racked my brain trying to figure out how you came up with that number so I did a calculation to see how such a high number could have be achieved. If we count every vote cast for every candidate in that election we get this number. 77,744,033 votes in total for 1972. Now keep in mind that’s for ALL of the candidates but for the sake of Republican mathematics we’ll give all those votes to Nixon. That of course still leaves us with a shortfall of 85,521votes. Those I’ll assume were people who wanted to vote for Nixon and would have but they were suffering for a slight case of being dead that day and couldn’t make it to the polls. I’m sure they thank you for being nice enough to write their votes in for them.

And now let's look at McGovern.
You said he got 1,278,260 votes

I can only surmise that you came up with that number by excluding the total popular vote and counted only Mass. popular vote, which was 1,332,540 votes. So even there you undercounted Democrats votes. Let me ask you, do you happen to work for the Florida Board of Elections? LMAO!!!!!!!

However you slice though, THAT"S A LIE

He actually got 29,173,222 votes - 37.52% of the vote
A difference of 27,894,962 votes

I think that maybe when you were quoting McGovern numbers you were actually thinking of little known American Party candidate Thomas Anderson
Thomas Anderson got 1,100,868 votes, a total of 1.42% of the total votes cast in the 1972 election. I would say you were thinking of him, but you didn't even get that number right.

Now on to your claim that McGovern only won the electoral votes of Mass. There you are not so wrong, but you are still WRONG. He won Mass. and the District of Columbia. Yes it’s a minor correction but in the interest of accuracy I think we should be fair to the citizens of D.C. and note it.

WHY DO I CALL WHAT YOU DID A LIE AND NOT A MISTAKE? Because you unrealistically hyped the numbers for Nixon and unskillfully decimated the numbers for McGovern.
Now come up with a good excuse as to why you did that. "Um UH Well I really meant....UH I was miss quoted...I never said that."
LOL

Awwwwwwwww poor poor Bane. I can see the liberals are getting under your skin. So much so that your willing to make a complete A#$ of yourself by trying to float such an obvious LIE .

AMERICANS LOVE CLINTON!!
Even after all you guys did to sway them.
AMERICANS LOVE CLINTON!
Even after all of OUR MONEY that you wasted in trying to take him down.
AMERICANS STILL LOVE CLINTON!

When Nixon was elected over McGovern the public barely had any idea of the scope of Watergate. Certainly they had no clue it reached as high as it did. But let's check the dwindling support of Tricky Dick as the public was made aware.

Nixon (Gallup)
1/1973
Approve 51%
Disapprove 37%

6/1973
Approve 44%
Disapprove 45%

1/1974
Approve 27%
Disapprove 63%

8/1974
Approve 24%
Disapprove 66%

Think he could have beat McGovern after the public found out the truth about him?
Now lets just have a look at Bush's Job approval numbers.

Bush,
Gallup Poll
June 28, 2006
Approve 35%
Disapprove 57%

What's that!!!! You know something Bane; I think there's hope for you guys yet. You can always say that Bush has a higher job approval rating than Nixon (by an itty bitty tennie wennie bit).

Now I know you won't respond or defend yourself because anytime I catch one of you in a blatant lie you never do. Just know that one of you've been caught again. Getting caught so easily like this is what happens when you listen to too much Rush Limbaugh. LOL

I THINK THESE LIBERALS IS STARTING TO BECOME THE BANE OF YOUR EXISTANCE.

ROTFLMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leftoverhippy,
First off, I have never had a conversation with you; second, I have never lied on this or any other post, so your assertion that you caught me in a lie is delusional.

Next, I posted the result from Wikpedia on the election results and lo I typed the total instead of Nixon’s amount only. That is called a mistake, not a lie. The % quoted was correct; the point is that popularity doesn’t make the President right or wrong it makes the President popular or un-popular.

You are picking fly sh*t out of the pepper, for no other reason than your thesis that Nixon was popular among conservatives is specious, delusional and a lie.

I voted in the 1972 election, and every election since.

I don’t know what all the rest of your drivel is supposed to mean, popularity contests for someone that Conservatives didn’t approve of to begin with. Why don’t you post the popularity contests of Jimmy Carter? Or Warren Harding? Or Andrew Jackson? They all mean about the same to me; not a damn thing.

Now, take your lying act on the road, I’m done with you. .

Bane-
"I voted in the 1972 election, and every election since."

Well if that vote was for Nixon then you have my condolences.

"Next, I posted the result from Wikpedia on the election results and lo I typed the total instead of Nixon’s amount only."

In the interest of fairness I checked your Wikpedia explanation. I think such a fine site for information should know that they had incorrect info and I wanted to help them get it right. But what did I find when I went there? I found they had it right after all.

I still have no clue where you pulled your "mistaken" Nixon number from cause it's no where to be found. It is in fact more than the total number of votes cast for that election and Wikpedia agrees. So even if as you claim you "mistakenly" wrote The total votes number in place of the actual Nixon total then we can only assume you were "mistaken while being mistaken".

And as for your McGovern number I can't find that anywhere on Wikpedia either. In fact, I can't find it anywhere at all and believe me I've tried.

So to recap, you "mistakenly" provided an incredibly high number of votes for Nixon while you "mistakenly" slashed to the bone the number of votes for McGovern.

Is that right? I just want to make sure that we're picking the right fly sh#* out of your story.

You also "mistakenly" left out DC's voting for McGovern saying that he ONLY got MA, even though it's clearly marked on the Wipedia page you posted. Maybe the District was too small for you to see.

Why don't you just admit that you kind of maybe made those numbers up? That you mouthed off in the heat of the moment without completely thinking it through. It's a common problem among conservatives and the sooner you admit that you have a problem the sooner you can get help for it.

You do that and I wouldn’t say another word about it. Promise. And you have that in writing.
Not holding my breath though.

Bane-
"I voted in the 1972 election, and every election since."

Well if that vote was for Nixon then you have my condolences.

"Next, I posted the result from Wikpedia on the election results and lo I typed the total instead of Nixon’s amount only."

In the interest of fairness I checked your Wikpedia explanation. I think such a fine site for information should know that they had incorrect info and I wanted to help them get it right. But what did I find when I went there? I found they had it right after all.

I still have no clue where you pulled your "mistaken" Nixon number from cause it's no where to be found. It is in fact more than the total number of votes cast for that election and Wikpedia agrees. So even if as you claim you "mistakenly" wrote The total votes number in place of the actual Nixon total then we can only assume you were "mistaken while being mistaken".

And as for your McGovern number I can't find that anywhere on Wikpedia either. In fact, I can't find it anywhere at all and believe me I've tried.

So to recap, you "mistakenly" provided an incredibly high number of votes for Nixon while you "mistakenly" slashed to the bone the number of votes for McGovern.

Is that right? I just want to make sure that we're picking the right fly sh#* out of your story.

You also "mistakenly" left out DC's voting for McGovern saying that he ONLY got MA, even though it's clearly marked on the Wipedia page you posted. Maybe the District was too small for you to see.

Why don't you just admit that you kind of maybe made those numbers up? That you mouthed off in the heat of the moment without completely thinking it through. It's a common problem among conservatives and the sooner you admit that you have a problem the sooner you can get help for it.

You do that and I wouldn’t say another word about it. Promise. And you have that in writing.
Not holding my breath though.

Leftoverhippy,
You’re still here? Jesus, bring me that dead horse.

What did you did with those Gore, Kerry, Mondale, Carter, Dukakis, and McGovern bumper stickers? Are they all still on your 1968 VW bus? Has there ever been a socialist loser you didn’t support?

I’m still waiting for any evidence of the liberal lie that “Bill Clinton … took us from budget deficits to a budget surplus” Just one thing your boy-friend said or did that helped the economy. The only thing I find was his acceptance of campaign money from the Chinese communists, (your heroes) that added money to our economy. Oh, wait, he did rent the Lincoln bedroom; that was a real economy expanding measure, and firing Billy Dale that must have been to encourage investment in travel agencies.

And, just what was that surplus that you cite? Oh, right … the Social Security Trust Fund that was actually spent to pay the governments’ bills. But, because your head is a hollow as the “surplus” you swallow anything Clinton gives you (place Monica joke here).

Okay, quote some worthless popularity contest numbers, Although Clinton never once proposed a balanced budget he nevertheless took credit for the Republican Budgets and the Wall Street response to the Socialists losing the House after forty years of democrat corruption, so opinion polls are more important than truth. Good liberal, don't stray from your socialist overlords' talking points. !