The consumers are only confident because they don't know the facts! Listen to Russ Feingold, he knows the truth!

So in other words still not as good as when Clinton was in office.....I see

A measure tracking consumers' sentiments on jobs climate jumped in early April to 124.5 the highest on record.

Dispite the daily drumbeat from the nattering nabobs of negativity.

Some perennial malcontent said:
"The consumers are only confident because they don't know the facts"

Liberal Doublespeak translation:

Consumers are too stupid to listen to us bad mouth the economy because it make us look like we don’t know what we are talking about.

Porter,
I think shoelimpy was being sarcastic, just a guess. It's actually pretty funny jesting of the liberal responses we expect to see.

The economy is doing a far sight better than it was doing in 2000, when the "great" Clinton economy was crumbling like the house of cards that it was.

And yes, shoelimpy was being sarcastic. Should I ever begin actually chanting such inanities and beliving in them, I would hope to be quickly and readily put out of my misery.

As home sales surged ahead last month.

Oh hey muirgeo,

Clinton didn't have one of the largest national disasters in history did he? Was Clinton conducting major combat operations? Were the gas prices at 3 dollars a gallon? No? Really? Oh that's right! He was too busy governing by the polls and getting blowjobs!

WE HAVE THIS AWESOME ECONOMY DESPITE THE NATURAL DISASTERS, ENERGY CRISIS, AND DURING WARTIME. THIS ECONOMY FUCKIN ROCKS!!!!

Calm down, RA--morongeo is an unhinged kook. And an offensive one at that--I get chastised whenever I bring up ol' Slicky Blue-Dress, but the moonbats can tout his "achievement" as much as they wish.

That's right, morongeo, I said "achievement," as in one achievement. He wouldn't have had that one achievement, had it not been for a GOP-majority House. Now, no more mentions of Slicky Blue-Dress, 'kay?

Oh hey muirgeo,

Clinton didn't have one of the largest national disasters in history did he?

Posted by: Republican Aficionado at April 25, 2006 08:29 PM

What largest national disaster in history? You mean Bush? Yeah Clinton didn't have Bush. Back then Bush's damage was confined to Texas. But yeah that was my point Bush is one of the largest National disasters in our history.

Posted by: shoelimpy

"...Should I ever begin actually chanting such inanities and beliving in them, I would hope to be quickly and readily put out of my misery."

You can count on your good buddies to see to that, for sure!!

"What largest national disaster in history? You mean Bush? Yeah Clinton didn't have Bush. Back then Bush's damage was confined to Texas. But yeah that was my point Bush is one of the largest National disasters in our history."

This is a very sound argument, completely refuting the point that Aficionado was trying to make. If the Democrats would just have this message on their platform this November, they'll be certain to win at least 20 seats.