Same man George Bush called a "true American hero", now regarded as dirt. Jeeze I'm glad I'm not yalls friends, it doesn't count for dirt!!

Well, yes, of course he hates Bush, Rove, and neocons. Collectively, your destroying civilization.

So what makes Joe Wilson any different than some of the Bush-hating vermin who come to troll on this site?

Politics can be a very nasty business sometimes. If you're going to swim with the sharks, make sure you don't cut yourself before you plunge into the water...

Or, as my Grandmother was fond of saying,

"When you sleep with dogs, you're going to wake up with fleas..."

Joe Wilson has been a political hack from the very beginning of this tawdry affair, that much was obvious to me at least. Of course, when President Bush called him a "true American hero," he was, as is his custom, being a gentleman in front of those with lesser class...

Just look at how he responded at the Coretta Scott King Bush-bashing -- err - funeral. You'll see that he has more class in his little finger than the lot of them combined...

Hail to the Chief!

http://www.manuse.com/blog/htsrv/trackback.php/169

Ooops!

I meant to copy:

www.blog.danielbogdan.com/

Hail to the Chief!!

"Joe Wilson: A Man Of Class And Integrity"

I threw up in my mouth a little bit.

According to the Senate Committee Report, he is also a liar.

Can anyone point me toward any accusitor besides Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely as well as a second by-line besides Art Moore and WorldNetDaily? Forgive me, but that's how I verify things. I'm a scientist by trade, and I'm not inclined to believe anything any one person says, especially if it's something one person says someone else said. I'm anal that way. So I'd appreciate it if someone could help me out. I can't find anything on Google, except references back to the original article.

Just because Bush directed his staff to leak classified information and put his wife in danger along with other covert CIA operatives is no excuse for Joe Wilson to have a beef against the liar in chief, right? Just because Bush lied about intelligence he knew was wrong to pull the country into a disastrous war is no reason for Joe Wilson to speak out, right?

Sista, time to pull that rag out ya rear end and stuff it in ya mouth. Toldja so.

So far, since the word got out that Bush authorized "leaks", I've read on this site that Joseph Wilson:
-- Didn't do anything on hiw trip to Niger except sit by the pool drinking margaritas.
-- Is a political hack.
-- Is a Bush-hating vermin
-- A serial liar

So right back to the right-wing tactic... if someone disagrees or points out that you are wrong, smear them. Call them names. Call them an idiot.

Tina, …”According to the Senate Committee Report, he is also a liar.”

Tina if you make a statement like that, you better back it up! Please link or cut & paste the part of Senate Select Committees BIPARTISEN conclusion that makes that claim. If you can not produce evidence, than you better apologize to Joe Wilson.

I read the quotes, and I got say that Joe is right on every point. Tom E. never even disputes the accuracy of the quotes.

Paul Valley is liar, and I can prove it. Here is what he stated as fact on the O'Reilly Factor on 8 May, 2003:
"It appears from reports that we are getting now that the mobile vehicles that they had, you know they found one up north that was sanitized. They found all the historic data of a weapons program but haven't found the actual biological or chemical weapons.

It appears that a lot of those weapons were transited out of Baghdad through Syria and now are buried in the Bekaa Valley as deep as 30 to 40 meters. The Syrians are looking the other way. The only way this is going to be validated, Bill, we are going to have to take on that Bekaa Valley challenge some way or another to validate if this is true or not."

Also, ... “Vallely says, according to his recollection, Wilson mentioned his wife's job in the spring of 2002” “Paul Vallely told WorldNetDaily that Wilson mentioned Plame's status as a CIA employee over the course of at least three, possibly five, conversations in 2002..”

But he said this on 11/8 (WND) “…After recalling further over the weekend his contacts with Wilson, Vallely says now it was on just one occasion – the first of several conversations – that the ambassador revealed his wife's employment with the CIA and that it likely occurred some time in the late summer or early fall of 2002.

First it was is the spring, than it was in the fall. Maybe it was five times, maybe it was one time. The liar can’t even get his lies straight.

I doubt that Joe Wilson hates Bush, because he probably never loved him. I do believe that he, along with other truth seeking citizens, much like me, vehemently dislike seeing an unqualified
son of a president trying to act like the leader of the USA. A leader who is coached by the Neoconservatives, and promoting an agenda spelled out in the "Project For The New American Century" archives.

The former CIA official who coordinated U.S. intelligence on the Middle East until last year has accused the Bush administration of "cherry-picking" intelligence on Iraq to justify a decision it had already reached to go to war, and of ignoring warnings that the country could easily fall into violence and chaos after an invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein.
The truth, as revealed by Paul R Piller, is the same truth that we knew was being underreported in the media in the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq.
The President, and all of his PNAC cronies should be censured, not only for lying, but for planning a war that was in my opinion, iniated for their own agenda in the Middle East.
***************************
Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq
Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 10, 2006; Page A01

Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq
Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 10, 2006; Page A01

Paul R. Pillar, who was the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia from 2000 to 2005, acknowledges the U.S. intelligence agencies' mistakes in concluding that Hussein's government possessed weapons of mass destruction. But he said those misjudgments did not drive the administration's decision to invade.

"Official intelligence on Iraqi weapons programs was flawed, but even with its flaws, it was not what led to the war," Pillar wrote in the upcoming issue of the journal Foreign Affairs. Instead, he asserted, the administration "went to war without requesting -- and evidently without being influenced by -- any strategic-level intelligence assessments on any aspect of Iraq."

Paul R. Pillar, , who was the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia from 2000 to 2005, says warnings on Iraq were ignored. (By Dennis Cook -- Associated Press)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/09/AR2006020902418.html